USA v. Diepersloot

Filing 15

ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 13 Motion to Vacate Consent Defendant's Motion to Vacate Consent Decree of Permanent Injunction, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/2/2022. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 1:96-cv-05304-DAD-MJS

v.
ROBERT J. DIEPERSLOOT, AN
INDIVIDUAL, DOING BUSINESS AS
DUTCH APPLE FARMS DAIRY,

16

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO VACATE CONSENT DECREE
OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION
(Doc. No. 13)

Defendant.

17
On April 19, 2022, defendant Robert J. Diepersloot, an individual formerly doing business

18
19

as Dutch Apple Farms Dairy, filed a motion with the court seeking an order vacating the consent

20

decree of permanent injunction entered against defendant on March 26, 1996. Pursuant to

21

paragraph seventeen of that consent decree, this court retained jurisdiction over this action and the

22

parties for the purpose of enforcing and/or modifying the decree and for the purpose of granting

23

such additional relief as may be necessary and appropriate. (Doc. No. 6-2 at 13.)
Defendant has alleged in his pending motion that he has satisfied all of his obligations

24
25

under the consent decree. (Doc. No. 13.) On April 20, 2022, plaintiff filed a statement of non-

26

opposition to defendant’s motion to vacate the consent decree of permanent injunction. (Doc. No.

27

14.)

28

/////
1

1

In light of the foregoing, defendant’s motion to vacate the consent decree and permanent

2

injunction in this case (Doc. No. 13) is hereby granted.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

Dated:

May 2, 2022
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2