Atchison Topeka, et al v. Hercules Inc, et al

Filing 446

Stipulation for Dismissal of Claims and ORDER signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 5/24/2010. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 JOHN F. BARG (State Bar No. 60230) (jfb@bcltlaw.com) MARC A. ZEPPETELLO (State Bar No. 121185) (maz@bcltlaw.com) BARG COFFIN LEWIS & TRAPP, LLP 350 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94104-1435 Telephone: (415) 228-5400 Attorneys for BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, as successor to THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No.: CV-F-96-5879 OWW/DLB (CONSOLIDATED SHAFTER CASES) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND ORDER __________________________________ 13 v. 14 HERCULES INCORPORATED, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), BNSF Railway Company (formerly Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company and successor to The Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company) ("BNSF"), The Dow Chemical Company ("Dow"), Shell Oil Company ("Shell"), the California Department of Toxic Substances Control ("DTSC"), and Hercules Incorporated ("Hercules"), collectively referred to herein as the "Parties," hereby stipulate and agree as follows: A. On January 14, 1998, DTSC filed an action in this Court against a number of individuals and entities including, but not limited to, BNSF, Dow, Shell, and Hercules, for cost recovery, declaratory relief, and civil penalties in connection with response costs incurred and to be incurred by DTSC at or in connection with the Brown & Bryant Shafter Site. DTSC v. Brown & Bryant, Inc., et al., Case No. CIV-F-98-5050 ("DTSC Action"). The Court consolidated the STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. CV-F-96-5879 OWW/DLB 725966 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DTSC Action with two earlier actions which had been filed concerning the Brown & Bryant Shafter Site: Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., et al. v. Brown & Bryant, Inc., et al., Case No. CIV-F-92-5068; and Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Hercules Incorporated, et al., Case No. CIV-F-96-5879, and directed that "all future pleadings should contain ONLY the LEAD CASE NUMBER OF CV-F-96-5879 OWW DLB (member case 98-5050-OWW)." (These consolidated actions insofar as they relate to the Brown & Bryant Shafter Site are hereafter referred to as the "Consolidated Shafter Cases.") DTSC filed a First Amended Complaint on March 9, 1998 and a Second Amended Complaint on November 6, 1998. B. On or about May 6, 1998, BNSF filed its answer and cross-claim in the Consolidated Shafter Cases, and on or about November 9, 1998, BNSF filed its answer to DTSC's Second Amended Complaint and an amended cross-claim. BNSF's amended cross-claim asserts claims against a number of individuals and entities including, but not limited to, Dow, Shell, and Hercules. C. On or about April 6, 1998, Dow filed its answer and counterclaim in the Consolidated Shafter Cases, and on or about May 6, 1998, Dow filed its first amended answer and first amended counterclaim to DTSC's First Amended Complaint. On or about June 11, 1998, Dow filed a motion to dismiss and to strike portions of BNSF's cross-claim and Dow amended that motion on or about July 13, 1998. Dow's motion to dismiss and to strike portions of BNSF's cross-claim was granted by order of November 13, 1998. On November 30, 1998, Dow filed its answer to BNSF's cross-claim along with a cross-claim against BNSF. BNSF answered the crossclaim on December 18, 1998. D. On or about June 15, 1998, Shell filed its answer in the Consolidated Shafter Cases, and on or about June 24, 1998, Shell filed its answer to BNSF's cross-claim. E. On or about October 30, 1998, Hercules filed its answer in the Consolidated Shafter Cases to DTSC's First Amended Complaint, a counterclaim against DTSC, and a cross-claim against BNSF. DTSC answered the counterclaim on November 20, 1998, and BNSF answered the cross-claim on November 23, 1998. F. On or about May 4, 2009, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in 2 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND ORDER Case No. CV-F-96-5879 OWW/DLB 725966 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, et al. v. United States, et al., 129 S. Ct. 1870 (2009), which, among other matters, addressed the issue of "arranger liability" under the Section 107(a)(3) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9607(a)(3). G. Following and based on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Burlington Northern v. United States, cited above, DTSC informed BNSF, Dow, Shell, and Hercules that DTSC would dismiss its claims against Dow and Shell in the Consolidated Shafter Cases. On November 17, 2009, the Court entered a Stipulation for Dismissal of Claims and Order, dismissing with prejudice DTSC's claims against Dow and Shell, and dismissing with prejudice Dow's counterclaim against DTSC, in the Consolidated Shafter Cases. Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree to, and request that the Court order, the following: 1. BNSF's amended cross-claim against Dow in the Consolidated Shafter Cases is dismissed with prejudice, with BNSF and Dow each to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. 2. Dow's cross-claim against BNSF in the Consolidated Cases is dismissed with prejudice, with Dow and BNSF each to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. 3. BNSF's amended cross-claim against Shell in the Consolidated Shafter Cases is dismissed with prejudice, with BNSF and Shell each to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. 4. This Stipulation and Order shall have no effect on DTSC's claims in the Consolidated Shafter Cases against BNSF or Hercules, nor shall it have any effect on BNSF's or Hercules's defenses to those claims. 5. This Stipulation and Order shall have no effect on BNSF's and Hercules's claims in the Consolidated Shafter Cases against each other, nor shall it have any effect on BNSF's or Hercules's defenses to such claims. 6. This Stipulation may be signed in counterparts and facsimiles of signatures, or signatures on a portable document format (pdf) copy of this Stipulation, shall have the same force and effect as originals. 7. Each of the signatories hereto is authorized to enter into the Stipulation on behalf of 3 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND ORDER Case No. CV-F-96-5879 OWW/DLB 725966 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 the party for whom he or she signs. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: May 21, 2010 BARG COFFIN LEWIS & TRAPP, LLP /s/ Marc A. Zeppetello MARC A. ZEPPETELLO Attorneys for BNSF Railway Company Dated: May 21, 2010 WENDEL, ROSEN, BLACK & DEAN, LLP /s/ Stephen McKae STEPHEN McKAE Attorneys for The Dow Chemical Company Dated: May 21, 2010 LEWIS, BRISBOIS, BISGAARD & SMITH /s/ Michael K. Johnson MICHAEL K. JOHNSON Attorneys for Shell Oil Company Dated: May 21, 2010 EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Attorney General of the State of California KEN ALEX Senior Assistant Attorney General /s/ Sandra Goldberg SANDRA GOLDBERG Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Dept. of Toxic Substances Control Dated: May 21, 2010 K & L GATES, LLP /s/ Edward P. Sangster EDWARD P. SANGSTER Attorneys for Hercules Incorporated IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: DEAC_Signature-END: May 24, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 emm0d64h 4 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND ORDER Case No. CV-F-96-5879 OWW/DLB 725966

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?