San Luis & Delta, et al v. USA, et al
Filing
746
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Stockton East Water District's Supplemental Complaint 648 should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 9/4/2009. (Show Cause Response due by 9/14/2009.)(Kusamura, W)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY AND WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ) INTERIOR, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________ ) SAVE SAN FRANCISCO BAY ASSOC., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ) INTERIOR, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) )
1:97-cv-6140 OWW DLB 1:98-cv-5261 OWW DLB ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY STOCKTON EAST WATER DISTRICT'S SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT (DOC. 648) SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION.
On May 19, 2006, Stockton East Water District ("Stockton") filed a Supplemental Complaint for Injunctive Relief. Doc. 648, May 24, 2006. Stockton has taken no action on this complaint since its filing. Stockton is ordered to show cause in writing on or before September 14, 2009, why the entire supplemental complaint should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. SO ORDERED Dated: September 4, 2009 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger__________ OLIVER W. WANGER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
