Bolin v. Jill L. Brown, et al
Filing
353
ORDER VACATING August 9, 2016 Hearing and Scheduling Petitioner's 352 Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 07/11/2016. (30-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
PAUL C. BOLIN,
11
12
13
14
Case No. 1:99-cv-05279 LJO-SAB
Petitioner,
DEATH PENALTY CASE
v.
ORDER VACATING AUGUST 9, 2016
HEARING AND SCHEDULING
PETITIONER’S MOTION TO ALTER OR
AMEND JUDGMENT
RON DAVIS, Warden of San Quentin State
Prison,
Respondent.
15
(Doc. No. 352)
16
17
On July 7, 2016, petitioner filed a Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment
18 entered June 9, 2016 upon memorandum and order: dismissing without prejudice unexhausted
19 allegations, denying further record expansion and evidentiary hearing, denying the amended
20 petition for writ of habeas corpus and issuing a certificate of appealability for claims C2, I13, L
21 (L1-L4) & W2. (See Doc. Nos. 350 & 351.) Petitioner states the motion will be heard on
22 August 9, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before the undersigned.
23
This order vacates the hearing and provides a schedule for petitioner’s motion.
24
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
25
1.
26
27
The August 9, 2016 hearing is vacated, the parties will be notified by minute
order if a hearing is necessary,
2.
Respondent’s opposition to the motion, if any, shall be filed not later than thirty
28
1
(30) days following the filed date of this order, and
1
2
3.
Petitioner’s reply to the opposition, if any, shall be filed not later than fifteen (15)
days following the filed date of repondent’s opposition.
3
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____
July 11, 2016
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?