Rivera, et al v. Nibco Inc, et al

Filing 801

ORDER on Stipulation to Extend the Time for Defendant Nibco, Inc. to Respond to Administrative Motion of Christopher Ho to Unseal Certain Filings and Order Relating to the Parties' Cross Motions for Summary Judgment, signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 02/14/2024. Response due by 2/23/2024. (Maldonado, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6

William C. Hahesy, State Bar No. 105743
SAGASER, WATKINS & WIELAND, PC
5260 North Palm Avenue, Suite 400
Fresno, California 93704
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Emails: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant, NIBCO, INC.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15

MARTHA RIVERA, MAO HER, ALICIA
ALVAREZ, EV A ARRIOLA, PEUANG
BOUNNHONG, CHHOM CHAN, BEE LEE,
PAULA MARTINEZ, MARIA MEDINA,
MAI MEEMOUA, MARGARITA
MENDOZA, BAO NHIA MOUA, ISIDRA
MURILLO, MARIA NAVARRO,
VATHRATTANATAY, OFELIA RIVERA,
SARA RIVERA, MARIA RODRIGUEZ,
MARIA RUIZ, MARIA VALDIVIA, SY
VANG, YOUA XIONG and SEE YANG,

16
17
18

Case No.: 1:99-cv-06443-JLT-HBK
STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE
TIME FOR DEFENDANT NIBCO, INC.
TO RESPOND TO ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION OF CHRISTOPHER HO TO
UNSEAL CERTAIN FILINGS AND
ORDER RELATING TO THE
PARTIES’ CROSS MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

Plaintiffs,
v.
NIBCO, INC., an Indiana corporation,

19

Defendant.

20
STIPULATION

21
22

1.

Christopher Ho, one the former Plaintiffs’ counsel in the above-referenced matter,

23

has filed an Administrative Motion to Unseal Certain Filings and Order Relating to the Parties’

24

Cross Motions for Summary Judgment (“Administrative Motion”).

25
26
27
28

2.

On January 30, 2024, Defendant Nibco, Inc., through counsel, accepted service of

this Administrative Motion.
3.

On January 30, 2024, the Court issued its Minute Order giving Defendant Nibco, Inc.

21 days from the date of service to file a response to the motion. By Defendant Nibco, Inc.’s
1
685038.3-016880.00002

1
2

calculation, the current deadline to respond is February 20, 2024.
4.

Additional time is needed to respond to the Administrative Motion. Defendant

3

Nibco, Inc. has thus requested, and the Plaintiff has agreed, to extend the deadline to Friday,

4

February 23, 2024. This Stipulation is being submitted to the Court pursuant to that agreement.

5

Defendant Nibco, Inc. respectfully requests that the Court grant that additional time.

6
7

Dated: February ___, 2024

LEGAL AID AT WORK

8
By:

9

Christopher Ho

10
11

Dated: February ___, 2024

SAGASER, WATKINS & WIELAND PC

12
By:_________________________________
William C. Hahesy
Attorneys for Defendant, NIBCO, INC.

13
14
15
16

[PROPOSED] ORDER

17

The Court having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation and good cause appearing therefor:

18

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for Nibco, Inc. to respond to the

19

Administrative Motion of Christopher Ho to Unseal Certain Filings and Order Relating to the

20

Parties’ Cross Motions for Summary Judgment shall be extended to and including Friday, February

21

23, 2024.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24

Dated:

February 14, 2024

25
26
27
28
2
685038.3-016880.00002