Richardson v. Bryant, et al
Filing
160
ORDER Striking Surreply 158 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/12/2010. (Verduzco, M)
(PC) Richardson v. Bryant, et al
Doc. 160
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 / 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PATRICK RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, vs.
1:99-cv-06575-OWW-GSA-PC ORDER STRIKING SURREPLY (Doc. 158.)
H. L. BRYANT, et al.,
Defendants.
Plaintiff, Patrick Richardson ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the original complaint on November 1, 1999. (Doc. 1.) This action now proceeds on the Second Amended Complaint filed on July 3, 2007, against defendant Captain D. Ortiz ("Defendant") for denial of access to the courts.1 (Doc. 85.) On January 28, 2010, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. (Docs. 144-150.) Plaintiff filed an opposition on May 3, 2010, and defendant filed a reply on May 13, 2010. (Docs. 152, 153.) On July 1, 2010, plaintiff filed a surreply entitled "Plaintiff's Request for Direct Judgement in the Form of Denial of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment." (Doc. 158.)
A ll other claims and defendants have been dismissed from this action.
1
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 6i0kij 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
The Local Rules provide for a motion, an opposition, and a reply. Neither the Local Rules nor the Federal Rules provide the right to file a surreply, and the court neither requested one nor granted a request on the behalf of Plaintiff to file one. Accordingly, Plaintiff's surreply, filed July 1, 2010, shall be stricken from the record. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's surreply, filed July 1, 2010, is STRICKEN from the court's record.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:
July 12, 2010
/s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?