Richardson v. Bryant, et al

Filing 92

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS 89 ; ORDER Denying Motion For Preliminary Injunction signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 2/5/2008. (Esteves, C)

(PC) Richardson v. Bryant, et al

Doc. 92

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 H. BRYANT, et al., 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants. _____________________________/ Patrick L. Richardson ("plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. On December 18, 2007, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction be denied. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations within thirty days. To date, plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire /// 1 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 89) PATRICK L. RICHARDSON, 1:99-cv-06575-OWW-GSA-PC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on December 18, 2007, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 2. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, submitted as part of the Second Amended Complaint filed July 3, 2007, is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 5, 2008 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2