Leach v. Lowe, et al

Filing 133

ORDER for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel 132 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/6/12: Defendants' response to motion to compel due within thirty days of the date of service of this order. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DONALD R. LEACH,

12

1:00-cv-06139-LJO-GSA PC

Plaintiff,

13

ORDER FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL

vs.
(Doc. 132.)

14

TOM CAREY, T. DREW,
D. SCHROEDER, and HAWS,

15
Defendants.
16

/

17

This is a civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Donald R. Leach

18

(“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff is presently incarcerated at Kern Valley

19

State Prison in Delano, California. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on August

20

2, 2000. (Doc. 1.) On December 17, 2010, Plaintiff and Defendants participated in settlement

21

proceedings before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston, and the case was settled. (Doc. 125.) On

22

January 3, 2011, the case was dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to the parties' stipulation. (Doc.

23

127.)

24

On November 14, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel Defendants to honor the

25

confidential settlement agreement. (Doc. 132.) Defendants have not filed a timely response to

26

Plaintiff’s motion. Local Rule 230(l). At this time, Defendants shall be required to file a response.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days of the date of service of this

2

order, Defendants shall file a response to the motion to compel filed by Plaintiff on November 14,

3

2011.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
6i0kij

January 6, 2012

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2