Buford v. Wasco State Prison, et al

Filing 178

DISCOVERY/SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 09/20/2007. Amended Pleadings due by 1/24/2008; Discovery due by 3/24/2008; Dispositive Motion due by 5/23/2008. (Esteves, C)

Download PDF
(PC) Buford v. Wasco State Prison, et al Doc. 178 Case 1:01-cv-05192-AWI-SMS Document 178 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Timothy Buford ("plaintiff") is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (Americans with Disabilities Act). This action is proceeding on plaintiff's second amended complaint, filed January 8, 2004, against defendants Carbajal, Bindel, Huertas, Dobbs, Cheatham, Leong, and Songer ("defendants") on plaintiff's ADA claim. Defendants have answered the second amended complaint filed on January 8, 2004. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1, 16, and 26-36, discovery shall proceed as follows: 1. Discovery requests shall be served by the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5 and Local Rule 5-135, and shall only be filed when required by Local Rules 33-250(c), 34-250(c), and 36-250(c); 2. Responses to written discovery requests shall be due forty-five (45) days after the request is first served; /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT TIMOTHY BUFORD, Plaintiff, v. WASCO STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants. / CASE NO. 1:01-cv-05192-AWI-SMS PC DISCOVERY ORDER SCHEDULING ORDER D e a d lin e to Amend Pleadings - 01/24/08 D is c o v e ry Cut-Off Date - 03/24/08 D is p o s itiv e Motion Deadline - 05/23/08 Case 1:01-cv-05192-AWI-SMS Document 178 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. To ensure that the responding party has forty-five (45) days after the request is first served to respond, discovery requests must be served at least forty-five (45) days before the discovery deadline; 4. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a), defendants may depose plaintiff and any other witness confined in a prison upon condition that, at least fourteen (14) days before such a deposition, defendants serve all parties with the notice required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(1); and 5. If disputes arise about the parties' obligations to respond to requests for discovery, the parties shall comply with all pertinent rules including Rules 5, 7, 11, 26, and 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rules 11-110, 7-130, 7-131, 5-133, 5-135, 6-136, 43-142, and 78-230(m) of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court, Eastern District of California. Unless otherwise ordered, Local Rule 37-251 shall not apply, and the requirement set forth in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 and 37 that a party seeking relief from the court certify that he or she has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with the other party or person in an effort to resolve the dispute prior to seeking court action shall not apply. Voluntary compliance with this provision of Rules 26 and 37 is encouraged, however. A discovery motion that does not comply with all applicable rules will be stricken and may result in imposition of sanctions. Further: 6. The deadline for amending the pleadings shall be January 24, 2008; 7. The parties are advised that the deadline for the completion of all discovery, including filing motions to compel, shall be March 24, 2008; 8. The deadline for filing pre-trial dispositive motions shall be May 23, 2008; 10. A request for an extension of a deadline set in this order must be filed on or before the expiration of the deadline in question; and 11. Extensions of time will only be granted on a showing of good cause. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: i0d3h8 September 20, 2007 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?