Buford v. Wasco State Prison, et al

Filing 232

ORDER REQUIRING Defendants' Counsel to File a Response to the Court's Orde of June 22, 2009, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 9/3/09: Response ddl 9/23/2009.(Hellings, J)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 On June 22, 2009, the Court ordered Defendants to notify the Court within fifteen days 16 17 the order. 18 Within twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order, Defendants' counsel shall file 19 a response to the Court's order of June 22, 2009. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Defendants previously declined to waive any conflict arising from having the same judge assigned to all m a t t e r s including settlement. Defendants are requested to again address the issue of consent in light of the Court's d e c i s i o n that a settlement conference would not be beneficial.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

TIMOTHY BUFORD, Plaintiff, v. WASCO STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants. /

CASE NO. 1:01-cv-05192-AWI-SMS PC ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS' COUNSEL TO FILE A RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S ORDER OF JUNE 22, 2009 (Doc. 228) TWENTY-DAY DEADLINE

whether or not they consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction.1 Defendants have not complied with

Dated: i0d3h8

September 3, 2009

/s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1