Rhodes v. Robinson, et al

Filing 275

ORDER Regarding Discovery and Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 9/24/12: The Discovery and Scheduling Order, issued August 9, 2012, is applicable to Defendants Chapman, Jones, Metzen, Todd, and Wenciker. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KAVIN M. RHODES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 Case No. 1:02-cv-05018-LJO-DLB PC ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING OR DER v. 14 ROBINSON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Kavin M. Rhodes (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California 18 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 19 in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s amended 20 complaint, filed June 9, 2011, against Defendants Wenciker1, Pazo, Tidwell, Chapman, Lopez, K. 21 Todd, Metzen, and Garza for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment, and against Defendants 22 Garza and Jones for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The United States 23 Marshal was directed to effect service as to Defendants Chapman, Garza, Jones, Metzen, Todd, and 24 Wenciker. On September 21, 2012, Defendants Chapman, Jones, Metzen, Todd, and Wenciker filed 25 an answer. On August 9, 2012, the Court had issued a discovery and scheduling order in this action. 26 In the interest of judicial economy, the Court will set the same discovery and schedule deadlines for 27 Defendants Chapman, Jones, Metzen, Todd, and Wenciker. 28 1 Plaintiff had named the Defendant as “Wenneker.” 1 1 2 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Discovery and Scheduling Order, issued August 9, 2012, is applicable to Defendants Chapman, Jones, Metzen, Todd, and Wenciker. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: /s/ Dennis September 24, 2012 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 DEAC_Signature-END: 7 3b142a 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?