Rhodes v. Robinson, et al

Filing 292

ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Motion to Modify Scheduling Order 291 Dispositive Motion Deadline: August 5, 2013, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 6/23/13. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KAVIN M. RHODES, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. ROBINSON, et al., Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:02cv05018 LJO DLB PC ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER (Document 291) Dispositive Motion Deadline: August 5, 2013 17 Plaintiff Kavin M. Rhodes (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to the August 9, 2012, Discovery and Scheduling Order, the 19 dispositive motion deadline is June 20, 2013. 20 21 22 On June 12, 2013, Defendants filed a Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order, and request a 45-day extension of the dispositive motion deadline. “A scheduling order may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” 23 Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). Here, Defendants’ counsel states that he was on FMLA leave for four weeks 24 in May 2013 and has numerous upcoming deadlines. Brice Decl. ¶¶ 3-6. Because of these factors, 25 counsel does not believe that he can meet the June 20, 2013, deadline. Brice Decl. ¶ 7. 26 27 The Court also notes that Findings and Recommendations are pending regarding dismissal of certain claims, for which Plaintiff has received an extension of time to file objections. 28 1 For GOOD CAUSE appearing, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED. The dispositive motion 1 2 deadline SHALL be extended to August 5, 2013. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 /s/ Dennis June 23, 2013 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 7 L. Beck 3b142a 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?