Rhodes v. Robinson, et al

Filing 303

ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; Twenty-One Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/17/2013. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

CASE No. 1:02-cv-05018-LJO-DLB PC
KAVIN M. RHODES,
Plaintiff

10
v.

11
12

M. ROBINSON, et al.,

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Plaintiff Kavin M. Rhodes, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on January 4, 2002. On August 5, 2013,
Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 296.) On September 12, 2013, the
Court issued an order granting Plaintiff a forty-five day extension of time to file an opposition.
(ECF No. 301.) More than forty-five days has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or
a statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l).
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion

within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order; and
2.

Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in

dismissal of the action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27

Dated:

December 17, 2013

/s/ Dennis

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:

28

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

Defendants.

13
14

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT