Rhodes v. Robinson, et al

Filing 331

ORDER Vacating Trial Confirmation Hearing Set for June 11, 2015; ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not be Dismissed, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/3/15. 5-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KAVIN MAURICE RHODES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. M. ROBINSON, et al., 15 Case No. 1:02-cv-05018 LJO DLB PC ORDER VACATING TRIAL CONFIRMATION HEARING SET FOR JUNE 11, 2015 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED Defendants. FIVE-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Plaintiff Kavin Maurice Rhodes, (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 19 pauperis, filed this civil rights action on January 4, 2002. Jury trial is set for July 21, 2015. Pursuant to the second scheduling order of January 27, 20 21 2015, Plaintiff’s pretrial statement was due on or before May 14, 2015, but Plaintiff failed to comply 22 with the order. 23 Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to show cause within five (5) days from the 24 date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed, with prejudice, as a sanction 25 against him for failing to obey a court order and failing to prosecute this action. The telephonic trial 26 confirmation hearing set for June 11, 2015, is VACATED pending resolution of this order to show 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 cause. The failure to comply with this order, or the failure to show good cause, will result in 2 dismissal of this action, with prejudice. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill June 3, 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?