Rhodes v. Robinson, et al
Filing
331
ORDER Vacating Trial Confirmation Hearing Set for June 11, 2015; ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not be Dismissed, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/3/15. 5-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KAVIN MAURICE RHODES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
M. ROBINSON, et al.,
15
Case No. 1:02-cv-05018 LJO DLB PC
ORDER VACATING TRIAL
CONFIRMATION HEARING SET FOR
JUNE 11, 2015
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
Defendants.
FIVE-DAY DEADLINE
16
17
Plaintiff Kavin Maurice Rhodes, (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
18
19
pauperis, filed this civil rights action on January 4, 2002.
Jury trial is set for July 21, 2015. Pursuant to the second scheduling order of January 27,
20
21
2015, Plaintiff’s pretrial statement was due on or before May 14, 2015, but Plaintiff failed to comply
22
with the order.
23
Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to show cause within five (5) days from the
24
date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed, with prejudice, as a sanction
25
against him for failing to obey a court order and failing to prosecute this action. The telephonic trial
26
confirmation hearing set for June 11, 2015, is VACATED pending resolution of this order to show
27
///
28
///
1
1
cause. The failure to comply with this order, or the failure to show good cause, will result in
2
dismissal of this action, with prejudice.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
June 3, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?