Weaver v. Woodford

Filing 132

ORDER Following Phase III CMC signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 09/03/2010. Opening Brief due by 1/10/2011. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
(DP) Weaver v. Woodford Doc. 132 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WARD FRANCIS WEAVER, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) Vincent Cullen, as Warden of San Quentin ) State Prison, ) ) Respondent. ) ) Case No. 1:02-cv-05583-AWI DEATH PENALTY CASE ORDER FOLLOWING PHASE III CMC DATE: August 24, 2010 TIME: 1:30 p.m. Courtroom Two IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA This matter came on for a Phase III Case Management Conference (CMC) on August 24, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. in the above-entitled court, the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii presiding. Petitioner Ward Francis Weaver ("Weaver") was represented by appointed attorneys Anne Lackey of the Habeas Corpus Resource Center and private attorney Karen S. Schryver, both of whom appeared telephonically. Respondent Vincent Cullen, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison (the "Warden"), was represented by his attorney of record Deputy Attorney General Leslie Westmoreland, who appeared in person. The purpose of the CMC was to establish a briefing schedule for Claims 1 and 2 of Weaver's amended petition and a budget for Weaver's litigation team to complete the briefing for these claims. Proceedings to discuss the briefing schedule were conducted with both parties present and publicly reported. The budget discussion with Weaver's attorneys was conducted confidentially and ex parte to protect attorney work product and the attorney client privilege. A sealed order authorizing a Phase III budget for Weaver's litigation team is filed concurrently herewith. Claims 1 and 2 allege denial of counsel at critical stages of Weaver's state trial and the failure of his trial counsel to subject the prosecution to meaningful adversarial testing under Cronic v. United 02dp5583.OFollPhaseIIICMC.Wea.wpd 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 States, 466 U.S. 648, 659 (1984). These claims stem from alleged mental and physical illnesses of Weaver's lead trial counsel, the late David Huffman, caused by his alcoholism and Vietnam combat induced post-traumatic stress disorder as well as a conflict of interest of both Mr. Huffman and wife/cocounsel Donnalee Huffman. Briefing of these claims is to include legal argument supporting the claims as well as any requests for further evidentiary development. Weaver requested 120 days within which to file his opening brief, the Warden requested the same amount of time to file his opposition brief, and Weaver asked for 60 days within which to file his reply brief. Weaver requested that the briefing schedule not commence until the Court approved a budget, so his litigation team would know exactly which tasks would be authorized. Weaver also clarified that he would like to engage in informal discussions with the Warden about obtaining thirdparty discovery during his briefing efforts. He stated he would like for informal discovery to be complete no later than 30 days before his opening brief is due. In the event informal discovery is not successful, Weaver will request discovery under Rule 6 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in his opening brief. For good cause appearing: 1. Weaver shall file his opening brief setting forth legal argument in support of and requests for further evidentiary to establish Claims 1 and 2 of the petition within 120 days of the filing of this order; 2. The Warden shall file his opposing brief with 120 days from the filing of Weaver's opening brief; and 3. Weaver shall file his reply brief within 60 days from the filing of the Warden's opposing brief. Unless further proceedings are necessary, the Court will issue a memorandum decision and order on the submitted briefing. In the event further briefing or a hearing is necessary, the Court will advise the parties in writing. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: September 3, 2010 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii Anthony W. Ishii United States District Judge 02dp5583.OFollPhaseIIICMC.Wea.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?