Ellis v. Cambra, et al

Filing 134

ORDER DENYING Motion to Vacate Order, and GRANTING Motion for One-Hundred Twenty Day Extension of Time to File Supplemental Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 132 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 4/27/09: Supplemental Opposition deadline set for 8/28/2009.(Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 / 15 16 On April 10, 2009, Plaintiff Randall E. Ellis filed a motion seeking to vacate the Court's 17 prior order granting a thirty-day extension of time to file his supplemental opposition to Defendant 18 Drew's motion for summary judgment, and requesting a one-hundred twenty day extension of time 19 to file the supplemental opposition. 20 Plaintiff's motion to vacate the prior order is HEREBY DENIED. The order granting the 21 thirty-day extension was filed on March 18, 2009, and because the time period has already expired, 22 it is unnecessary to vacate the order. 23 Plaintiff's motion for a one-hundred twenty day extension of time to file his supplemental 24 opposition is HEREBY GRANTED. The supplemental opposition is due within one-hundred 25 twenty (120) days from the date of service of this order. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: i0d3h8 April 27, 2009 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE v. STEVEN CAMBRA, JR., et al., Defendants. RANDALL E. ELLIS, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:02-cv-05646-AWI-SMS PC ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE ORDER, AND GRANTING MOTION FOR ONE-HUNDRED TWENTY DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 132) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?