Ellis v. Cambra, et al

Filing 146

ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff's Counsel of Record to Prepare and Forward a Substitution of Attorney Form that Complies with Local Rule 182(g) to Plaintiff signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 6/2/2010. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff Randall E. Ellis ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 16 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 17 On March 4, 2010, Plaintiff Randall E. Ellis filed a motion seeking to terminate his 18 representation by counsel of record, Anthony David Prince, Esq., and to restore Plaintiff to pro se 19 status. (Doc. 141.) On March 5, 2010, an order issued denying Plaintiff's motion since a 20 substitution of attorney form, signed by both Plaintiff and Mr. Prince, is required to terminate their 21 a representation relationship. (Doc. 142.) In that same order, Mr. Prince was ordered to: prepare 22 a substitution of attorney form, substituting himself out and returning Plaintiff to pro se status; sign 23 the substitution of attorney form; and send it to Plaintiff within ten (10) days of the date of that order 24 for Plaintiff to sign and file with the Court. (Id.) Mr. Prince did not comply with that order such that 25 an Order to Show Cause issued on May 12, 2010 which required a response and explanation by Mr. 26 Prince on or before May 27, 2010. (Doc. 144.) On May 27, 2010, Mr. Prince filed his response 27 indicating that a personal/familial emergency had caused his lack of compliance with the March 5, 28 2010 order, and attaching copies a form that Mr. Prince sent to Plaintiff substituting himself in pro v. STEVEN CAMBRA, JR., et al., Defendants. / RANDALL E. ELLIS, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:02-cv-05646-AWI-SMS PC ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL OF RECORD TO PREPARE AND FORWARD A SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY FORM THAT COMPLIES WITH LOCAL RULE 182(g) TO PLAINTIFF (Doc. 145) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 se in place of Mr. Prince. (Doc. 145-2.) However, the notice that Mr. Prince sent to Plaintiff does not comply with subsection (g) of Local Rule 182 (based on Fed. R. Civ. P. 83) which requires that a substitution of attorney form shall set forth the full name and address of the individual substituting in for the attorney and shall be signed by the withdrawing attorney, the new attorney (if any), and the client and shall state the words "IT IS SO ORDERED" with spaces designated for the date and signature of the Judge affixed at the end of the document. Accordingly, Mr. Prince is HEREBY ORDERED to prepare a substitution of attorney form that complies with Local Rule 182(g), substituting himself out and returning Plaintiff to pro se status. Mr. Prince is further ORDERED to sign the substitution of attorney form and send it to Plaintiff within ten (10) days of the date of this order for Plaintiff to sign and file it with the Court. Mr. Prince will be able to obtain his copy of the fully executed substitution of attorney form via the CM/ECF system when Plaintiff files it with this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: icido3 June 2, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?