Washington v. Early

Filing 110

ORDER ADOPTING in FULL the FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS 105 ; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment 102 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/10/09. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 10, 2009 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 1 Defendants. _____________________________/ Roderick Washington ("plaintiff") is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. On December 15, 2008, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that plaintiff's motion for default judgment be denied. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations within thirty days. To date, plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on December 15, 2008, are adopted in full; and Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is DENIED. vs. RICHARD EARLY, et al., RODERICK WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, 1:03-cv-05263-LJO-SMS-PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 105.) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (Doc. 102.) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?