Sinclair et al v. Fox Hollow, et al

Filing 551

ORDER Resetting Hearing on Motion For Partial Summary Judgment, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 4/29/2011. (Hearing on the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is reset to 5/2/2011 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3.) (Gaumnitz, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 D. Greg Durbin, # 81749 John M. Dunn, # 166482 Daniel S. Cho, # 260902 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP P.O. Box 28912 5 River Park Place East Fresno, CA 93720-1501 Telephone: (559) 433-1300 Facsimile: (559) 433-2300 (SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) 6 7 8 Attorneys Plaintiffs, Defendants and Cross-Defendants FOX HOLLOW OF TURLOCK OWNERS ASSOCIATION and CALIFORNIA EQUITY MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. and Defendant and Cross-Defendant ANDREW KATAKIS 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 FOX HOLLOW OF TURLOCK OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation; et. al., 15 Case No. 1:03-cv-05439 OWW DLB (Consolidated with 1:03-cv-5774 OWW SMS and Stanislaus County Superior Court Case No. 322675) Plaintiffs, 16 v. ORDER RESETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Docket #s 478 & 502] 17 MAUCTRST LLC; et. al., 18 Defendants. 19 Date: April 12, 2011 Time: 12:15 p.m. Courtroom: 3 Judge: Hon. Oliver W. Wanger 20 21 22 AND CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS 23 24 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs, Defendants, Cross-Defendants and Counter-Defendants 25 CALIFORNIA EQUITY MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. and FOX HOLLOW OF TURLOCK 26 OWNERS ASSOCIATION and Defendant, Cross-Defendant and Counter-Defendant ANDREW 27 KATAKIS (collectively the “CEMG/Fox Hollow Parties”), filed a Motion for Partial Summary 28 Judgment re Cross-Complaint claims herein on February 4, 2011 [Docket #s 478 & 479]; MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 RIVER PARK PLACE EAST FRESNO, CA 93720-1501 12444/00001-1719689.v1 [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 1 WHEREAS, Cross-Complainants Richard Sinclair, Gregory Mauchley and Brandon 2 Sinclair (the “Cross-Complainants”), filed their opposition thereto on March 14, 2011 [Docket 3 #493 and 494] and the CEMG/Fox Hollow Parties filed their reply on March 21, 2011 [Docket #s 4 503, 504, 505, 506, 507 and 508], and therefore the briefing on such motion has been completed; 5 WHEREAS, the Court, by Minute Order filed March 21, 2011, vacated the hearing on 6 such motion set for April 4, 2011, and directed that a new date for the motion would be discussed 7 at a hearing on other motions on April 11, 2011; 8 WHEREAS, Mr. Sinclair filed an ex parte application received by the Court on Monday 9 morning, April 11, 2011, to continue the April 11, 2011 hearing and the Court issued its Minute 10 Order continuing the hearing set for April 11, 2011, to 12:15 p.m. on Tuesday, April 12, 2011; 11 and 12 WHEREAS, the Court held the hearing on the other motions on April 12, 2011, 13 commencing at 12:15 pm, with D. Greg Durbin appearing for the CEMG/Fox Hollow Parties and 14 Steven Stoker appearing on behalf of Defendant and Counterclaimant Lairtrust LLC and 15 Defendants Mauctrst LLC and Capstone LLC: 16 NOW, THEREFORE, GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that the hearing 17 on the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment shall and hereby is reset for Monday, May 2, 2011, 18 at 10:00 a.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in Courtroom 3 of the above- 19 referenced Court. 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 29, 2011 /s/ OLIVER W. WANGER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 RIVER PARK PLACE EAST FRESNO, CA 93720-1501 12444/00001-1719689.v1 2 ORDER RESETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?