Sinclair et al v. Fox Hollow, et al
Filing
667
ORDER GRANTING the CEMG/Fox Hollow Parties' 485 Motion for More Definite Statement of Counterclaim of Lairtrust, LLC signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 7/6/2011. (Lairtrust, LLC shall file an Amended Counterclaim by: 8/7/2011) (Figueroa, O)
1
2
3
4
5
D. Greg Durbin, # 81749
John M. Dunn, # 166482
Daniel S. Cho, # 260902
McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard,
Wayte & Carruth LLP
P.O. Box 28912
5 River Park Place East
Fresno, CA 93720-1501
Telephone:
(559) 433-1300
Facsimile:
(559) 433-2300
(SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY)
6
7
8
9
Attorneys Plaintiffs, Defendants, Cross-Defendants, and
Counter-Defendants FOX HOLLOW OF TURLOCK
OWNERS ASSOCIATION and CALIFORNIA
EQUITY MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. and
Defendant, Cross-Defendant, and Counter-Defendant
ANDREW KATAKIS
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
FOX HOLLOW OF TURLOCK
OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, a California
Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation; et.
al.,
16
17
18
Case No. 1:03-CV-05439-OWW-DLB
(Consolidated with 1:03-CV-5774 OWW SMS
and Stanislaus County Superior Court Case No.
322675)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING THE CEMG/FOX
HOLLOW PARTIES' MOTION FOR MORE
DEFINITE STATEMENT OF
COUNTERCLAIM OF LAIRTRUST, LLC
v.
MAUCTRST LLC; et. al.,
19
Defendants.
20
AND CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
The Motion of Plaintiffs, Defendants, Cross-Defendants, and Counter-Defendants FOX
HOLLOW
OF
TURLOCK
OWNERS
ASSOCIATION,
CALIFORNIA
EQUITY
MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC., and Defendant, Cross-Defendant, and Counter-Defendant
ANDREW KATAKIS (collectively, the “CEMG/Fox Hollow Parties”) for More Definite
Statement of Counterclaim of LAIRTRUST, LLC [Docket # 485], having regularly come on for
hearing on April 12, 2011, with D. Greg Durbin appearing personally on behalf of the
28
12444/00001-1768850.v1
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW ,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
5 R IVER PARK PLACE EAST
FRESNO, CA 93720-1501
ORDER GRANTING THE CEMG/FOX HOLLOW PARTIES' MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
OF COUNTERCLAIM OF LAIRTRUST, LLC
1
CEMG/Fox Hollow Parties and Steven R. Stoker appearing personally on behalf of
2
Counterclaimant LAIRTRUST, LLC; the Counterclaim of Counterclaimant LAIRTRUST, LLC
3
[Docket #471] having been stayed by the order filed herein on May 13, 2011, except for claims
4
arising out of "Plaintiffs' alleged conduct during and after trial of the state court action." [See
5
Docket #s 473, 563, 576]; the present motion being directed to the remaining unstayed claims
6
arising out of the CEMG/Fox Hollow parties' conduct during and after trial of the state court
7
action alleged in the Counterclaim, having been argued and submitted; the Court having issued
8
and served its Memorandum Decision on June 28, 2011 [Docket # 644], granting such Motion for
9
More Definite Statement; and the Court finding that LAIRTRUST, LLC'S allegations concerning
10
the unstayed claims that are the basis of all twelve causes of action asserted in the Counterclaim
11
are unclear from the face of the Counterclaim and because the majority of LAIRTRUST, LLC'S
12
Counterclaim has been stayed, which requires a more definite statement to permit the CEMG/Fox
13
Hollow Parties to frame a response:
14
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
15
16
17
1. The CEMG/Fox Hollow Parties' Motion for More Definite Statement of Counterclaim
of LAIRTRUST, LLC is GRANTED; and;
18
2.
LAIRTRUST, LLC shall file an amended Counterclaim within thirty (30) days
19
following service of this Order.
20
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
24
July 6, 2011
/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
DEAC_Signature-END:
emm0d64h
27
28
12444/00001-1768850.v1
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW ,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
5 R IVER PARK PLACE EAST
FRESNO, CA 93720-1501
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THE CEMG/FOX HOLLOW PARTIES' MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE
STATEMENT OF COUNTERCLAIM OF LAIRTRUST, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?