Sinclair et al v. Fox Hollow, et al

Filing 716

ORDER DENYING Defendant's 710 Application to Continue Hearing; ORDER to Take Hearing off Calendar, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 08/2/2011. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 FOX HOLLOW OF TURLOCK OWNERS’ASSOCIATION, et al., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 10 11 12 13 Plaintiffs, v. RICHARD SINCLAIR, et al., 14 15 Defendants. 1:03cv5439 OWW DLB ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S APPLICATION TO CONTINUE HEARING (Document 710) ORDER TAKING HEARING OFF CALENDAR ) 16 17 On June 27, 2011, this Court issued an Order to Show Cause to Defendant Richard 18 Sinclair why sanctions should not be imposed under Rule 11(c)(3) for violations of Rule 11(b) in 19 moving to disqualify opposing counsel. The Court set the hearing for August 12, 2011. The 20 Court also ordered Mr. Sinclair to file a written response to the Order to Show Cause by July 29, 21 2011. He has failed to do so. 22 On August 1, 2011, Mr. Sinclair filed an application to advance the August 12, 2011, 23 hearing to August 26, 2011. According to Mr. Sinclair, he has “a Court matter in another town 24 previously set” and he “cannot be in both places at once.” Declaration of Richard Sinclair, ¶ 3. 25 Plaintiffs opposed the application on August 1, 2011, and submitted evidence 26 demonstrating that Mr. Sinclair filed a request to move a hearing in the Northern District to 27 August 12, 2011, three days after the Court’s June 27, 2011, order. Exhibits A and B, attached to 28 Declaration of John Dunn. 1 1 Mr. Sinclair has failed to file a timely written response as ordered by this Court. 2 Accordingly, he is not entitled to be heard and the August 12, 2011, hearing is TAKEN OFF 3 CALENDAR. The Court will issue a written order. 4 5 6 Mr. Sinclair’s application to advance the hearing is therefore DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 2, 2011 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?