Sinclair et al v. Fox Hollow, et al

Filing 879

ORDER DENYING Ex Parte Motion to Continue All Matters for Ninety Day, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/21/12. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 FOX HOLLOW OF TURLOCK ) OWNER’S ASSOCIATION, a California ) Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MAUCTRUST, LLC et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________ ) CASE NO. 1:03-CV-5439 AWI DLB ORDER DENYING EX PARTE MOTION TO CONTINUE ALL MATTERS FOR NINETY DAYS 12 13 Richard Sinclair, Lairtrust, LLC, and Capstone, LLC have made a motion to continue all 14 matters for ninety days in order to resolve some tax issues that cloud the legal status of Lairtrust, 15 which has had its license suspended by California’s Franchise Tax Board. Doc. 875. Sinclair 16 fears that opposing parties may seek to have certain claims adjudicated against Lairtrust based on 17 its status while the tax questions remain unresolved. The opposing parties have filed an 18 opposition to this motion for a continuance. Doc. 877. They point out that there are two motions 19 set for hearing on January 7, 2013 and that in neither motion is Lairtrust’s status an issue. 20 Based upon the argument that has been presented, there is no reason why the two pending 21 motions should not be heard on January 7, 2013. Sinclair will continue to try to restore 22 Lairtrust’s license in the meantime. Should any new motion arise in this case that implicates 23 Lairtrust’s legal status, the court would be open to a new motion. The existing motion to 24 continue all matters for ninety days (Doc. 875) is DENIED. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 December 21, 2012 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?