George v. Potter, et al

Filing 81

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/7/2009 continuing hearing on 66 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (Motion Hearing reset for 11/20/2009 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (DLB) before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck). Plaintiff is directed to file a response to Defendant's Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Filing Deadline set for 10/30/2009. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 D e f e n d a n ts ' motion for summary judgment is set for hearing on October 9, 2009. 19 Plaintiff, proceeding through counsel, filed his opposition to the motion, along with a 20 S tatem en t of Facts in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. However, 21 P la in tif f 's opposition does not comply with the requirements of Rule 56-260(b), Local Rules 22 o f Practice. Rule 56-260(b) provides: 23 24 25 26 27 28 (b ) Opposition. Any party opposing a motion for summary judgment or summary a d ju d ica tio n shall reproduce the itemized facts in the Statement of Undisputed Facts a n d admit those facts that are undisputed and deny those that are disputed, including w ith each denial a citation to the particular portions of any pleading, affidavit, d ep o sitio n , interrogatory answer, admission or other document relied upon in support o f that denial. The opposing party may also file a concise "Statement of Disputed F a c ts ," and the source thereof in the record, of all additional material facts as to which th e re is a genuine issue precluding summary judgment or adjudication. The opposing 1 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) vs. ) ) JOHN E. POTTER; and UNITED STATES ) POSTAL SERVICE, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) JODY K. GEORGE, 1:03cv06052 DLB ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3b142a 26 27 28 p a rty shall be responsible for the filing with the Clerk of all evidentiary documents c ite d in the opposing papers. See L.R. 5-133(j). If a need for discovery is asserted as a basis for denial of the motion, the party opposing the motion shall provide a s p e c if ic a tio n of the particular facts on which discovery is to be had or the issues on w h ic h discovery is necessary. Plaintiff's Statement of Facts in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary J u d g m e n t is neither the response required or the concise statement permitted by Rule 562 6 0 (b ). Indeed, Plaintiff failed to file any response to Defendants' Statement of Undisputed M a te ria l Facts in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. For these reasons: 1. T h e hearing on Defendants' motion for summary judgment is continued from F rid a y, October 9, 2009, to Friday, November 20, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. 2. W ith i n twenty (20) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall file a response to the Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Defendants' M o tio n for Summary Judgment in compliance with Local Rule 56-260(b), in clu d in g reproducing the itemized facts and admitting those facts that are u n d is p u te d and denying those that are disputed. With each denial, Plaintiff m u st provide a citation to the particular portions of any pleading, affidavit, d e p o sitio n , interrogatory answer, admission or other document relied upon in s u p p o rt of that denial. If not timely filed and in compliance with Rule 562 6 0 (b ), Plaintiff's response will be disregarded for purposes of resolving D e f e n d a n ts' motion for summary judgment. 3. W ith in ten (10) days of receiving Plaintiff's response to the statement of u n d is p u te d facts, Defendants may file a reply to the response. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 7, 2009 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?