Gomez v. Scribner, et al

Filing 176

ORDER Granting Extension Of Time To Submit Witness Fees 174 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/11/2009. (Case Management due by 2/20/2009) (Scrivner, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff David Maurice Gomez ("plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's amended complaint, filed October 21, 2003, against defendants Saddi, Bailey and German on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment failure-to-protect claim. On January 20, 2009, the Court issued an order providing the travel expenses plaintiff's unincarcerated witnesses, and extended the deadline for submitting the money orders to January 30, 2009. (Doc. 173). On January 29, 2009, Plaintiff filed a request for a two-week extension of time to submit his witness fees for witnesses Jane Kahn and Dr. Kim. (Doc. 174). Good cause appearing, the court shall extend the time for the submission of witnesses fees. The money orders are to be submitted no later than February 20, 2009. This matter is set for trial commencing March 31, 2009 and Plaintiff is advised that if he does not timely submit his money orders, it may not be possible for the United States Marshal to serve the summons upon his witnesses in order 1 vs. (Doc. 174) SADDI, et al., Defendants. / DAVID MAURICE GOMEZ, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:03-cv-6290 DLB PC ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT WITNESS FEES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 to secure their attendance at trial. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: d274kd February 11, 2009 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?