Pearson v. Duke, et al
ORDER DENYING 49 Plaintiff's Motion for Court Ordered Settlement Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/16/2010. (Jessen, A)
(PC) Pearson v. Duke, et al
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 W ALTER L. PEARSON, 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 MTA JONES, 12 Defendant. 13 / 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Walter Pearson ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff's Request for Court Ordered Settlement Conference. (ECF No. 49.) Plaintiff claims that he made a settlement demand on the Attorney General's office and asks that the Court order the Attorney General to participate in a settlement conference. As the Court noted in its November 15, 2010 Order, the Attorney General's Office is not a participant in this litigation. (ECF No. 53 at 2 n.1.) The only remaining Defendant is MTA Jones. The Attorney General's Office has not been retained to represent MTA Jones. Thus, the Court has no jurisdiction over the Attorney General's office in this case. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Request for Court Ordered Settlement Conference is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ci4d6 November 16, 2010 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (ECF No. 49) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR COURT ORDERED SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 1:03-cv-6334-AW I-MJS (PC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Michael J. Seng
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?