Chatman v. Tyner, et al

Filing 169

STIPULATION And ORDER Regarding Video Deposition Of Rodrigo Duran Conducted Via Video Conference, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/1/2009. (Scrivner, E)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

VAN LONGYEAR, CSB NO. 84189 JENNIFER MARQUEZ, CSB NO. 232194 LONGYEAR, O'DEA AND LAVRA, LLP 3620 American River Drive, Suite 230 Sacramento, CA. 95864 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant Rodrigo Duran

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

CHARLES JAMES CHATMAN
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) C. TYNER, et al. ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ______________________________________ )

CASE NO. 1:03-CV-06636 AWI SMS STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING VIDEO DEPOSITION OF RODRIGO DURAN CONDUCTED VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE

On July 20, 2009, the Court declined the order for the video deposition of defendant Duran stating that due to plaintiff's custody status, it would be impossible for plaintiff to attend a deposition in Texas. See Doc. 162. If defendant Duran's deposition occurred, it would be videotaped and it would proceed via video conference. Chatman is currently incarcerated at High Desert State Prison (HDSP) and HDSP has video conference capability. The federal prison where Duran is incarcerated can conduct the video deposition by video conference. Thus, Plaintiff would have an opportunity to question defendant Duran. The deposition would be videotaped and used at trial in lieu of live testimony.

L O N G Ye3620oAmerican974-8500 95864-5923 [phone] T Ee p h , e (916) eeRivera Drive, Suite 230 l A R n Oa't Drm A ta&LCA /V R A , L L P S Actroa E yn o , L A Facsimile n st w

///
S t ip u la tio n and [Proposed] Order Regarding Video Deposition of Rodrigo Duran Conducted Via Video Conference P age 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Counsel for Duran has met and conferred with the Attorney General's Office. The Attorney General's Office does not object to using a prerecorded video deposition of Duran in lieu of live testimony, as long as counsel for the State Defendants has the ability to participate in the video conference from a location in Sacramento. Counsel for Duran has met and conferred with plaintiff. Plaintiff also agrees to the video deposition of defendant Duran via video conference. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED: Dated: August 31, 2009 LONGYEAR, O'DEA & LAVRA, LLP

By: /s/ Jennifer Marquez JENNIFER MARQUEZ Attorney for Defendant R. Duran Dated: August 31, 2009 ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

By: /s/ Megan O'Carroll MEGAN R. O'CARROLL Attorney for Defendants Tyner, Alameida, Prunty, Chen, Yarborough, Calderon, Vasquez, Sullivan, Winett, Witcher, Stradley, Lundy, Fortson, Traynham, Mack, Wells, Jimenez, Bowman, Johnson August ____, 2009 PLAINTIFF IN PRO PER By: See Attached Fax Signature Charles James Chatman P-99062

L O N G Ye3620oAmerican974-8500 95864-5923 [phone] T Ee p h , e (916) eeRivera Drive, Suite 230 l A R n Oa't Drm A ta&LCA /V R A , L L P S Actroa E yn o , L A Facsimile n st w

20 21 22 23 24

ORDER
25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: 9h0d30 September 1, 2009 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

S t ip u la tio n and [Proposed] Order Regarding Video Deposition of Rodrigo Duran Conducted Via Video Conference P age 2