Romar v. Fresno Community, et al

Filing 211

ORDER for Status Report, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/14/2010.(Filing Deadline: 11/1/2010) (Martin, S)

Romar v. Fresno Community, et al

Doc. 211

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 This case settled in December 2009, and the minor's settlement was approved in June 20 2010. As part of the settlement, Plaintiff was to take the necessary steps to transfer jurisdiction 21 and supervision of the special needs trust to the Fresno Superior Court - Probate Division. On 22 July 6, 2010, Plaintiff filed a notice with this Court that she had filed a petition in the Fresno 23 Superior Court for transfer of jurisdiction. See Court's Docket Doc. No. 210. The Court has 24 heard nothing since. In light of the passage of three months, Plaintiff will be directed to inform 25 the Court whether the Fresno Superior Court has assumed jurisdiction over the special needs trust 26 and whether the Court can close this long pending case. 27 28 ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) FRESNO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ) AND MEDICAL CENTER, and ) DR. THOMAS MANSFIELD, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) CHRISTINA ROMAR, a minor suing through her mother and legal representative, CORA ROMAR, 1:03-CV-6668 AWI SMS ORDER FOR STATUS REPORT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, as soon as possible but no later than ten (10) calendar days from the service of this order, Plaintiff shall inform this Court in writing whether the Fresno Superior Court has assumed jurisdiction over the special needs trust and whether this Court may close this case.1

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 October 14, 2010 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

If the Fresno Superior Court has not assumed jurisdiction over the special needs trust, Plaintiff shall explain why jurisdiction has not been assumed. 2

1