Mistriel v. Kern County, et al
Filing
86
ORDER DISMISSING Defendant City of Bakersfield, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/20/2012. Plaintiff's 83 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
10
11
12
ROBERT GLEN MISTRIEL,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
COUNTY OF KERN et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
1:03-cv-06922-AWI-SKO
NO. 1:11-CV-1329 AWI GSA
ORDER DISMISSING
DEFENDANT CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD
(Document #85)
13
14
On March 15, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Dismiss Defendant City of Bakersfield.
15
Defendant City of Bakersfield filed a non-opposition to Plaintiff’s motion. No other Defendant
16
filed a response to Plaintiff’s motion. While Plaintiff admits in his motion that he did not serve
17
a copy of it on the other Defendants, Defendants knew about Plaintiff’s motion when the Clerk of
18
the Court scanned Plaintiff’s motion into the court’s CM/ECF electronic filing system.
19
Because Plaintiff has filed a motion to dismiss, Defendant Bakersfield does not oppose
20
the motion, and no other party has filed an opposition, the court finds that dismissal is
21
appropriate under Rule 41 as to Defendant City of Bakersfield only. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY
22
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and Defendant City of Bakersfield
23
is DISMISSED from this case.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated:
0m8i78
March 20, 2012
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?