Austin v. Winett, et al

Filing 117

ORDER VACATING August 25, 2009 114 Order and Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum as to Plaintiff Arondo Austin; ORDER VACATING Trial Date signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 9/15/2009. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Arondo Austin ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The action is currently set for trial before this Court on September 22, 2009. On August 25, 2009, the Court issued an order and Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum to transport Plaintiff, commanding the Warden of California State Prison - Sacramento to produce California prisoner Arondo Austin, CDCR #E-61218 in this Court on September 22, 2009, to testify at trial in this action. The parties attempted settlement, which was ultimately unsuccessful. (Doc. 111.) On September 11, 2009, Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time to accept Defendants' offer of settlement. (Doc. 116.) Because Plaintiff has indicated intent to settle, the Court will vacate its order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum as well as the trial date. // // // 1 v. D. L. WINETT, et al., (Doc. 114) Defendants. ORDER VACATING TRIAL DATE / ARONDO AUSTIN, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:04-cv-05104-DLB PC ORDER VACATING AUGUST 25, 2009 ORDER AND WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD T E S T I F IC A N D U M AS TO PLAINTIFF ARONDO AUSTIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS the following: 1) The Court's order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, filed on August 25, 2009, is vacated; and 2) the trial date of September 22, 2009 is vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: d274kd September 15, 2009 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?