Myles v. Sullivan, et al

Filing 46

**VACATED PER 66 ORDER.** ORDER GRANTING 45 Motion for Referral to the Pro Se Settlement Program; ORDER Referring Case to U.S. Magistrate Judge Vadas and the Pro Se Settlement Program for Mediation; ORDER Directing the Clerk to forward a copy of Order to U.S. Magistrate Judge Vadas; and ORDER DENYING Defendant's Request to Stay Case While the Parties Participate in Mediation signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 4/8/2009. (Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION Reynaldo Myles, Plaintiff, v. J. Busby, et al., Defendants. 1:04-cv-5329-JAT (PC) ORDER IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's motion for referral to the pro se settlement program, and specifically for referral to Magistrate Judge Vadas for mediation (part of Doc. #45) is granted; accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED referring this case to Magistrate Judge Vadas and the Pro Se Settlement Program for mediation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall forward a copy of this Order to Magistrate Judge Vadas (in addition to the parties). /// /// /// /// /// /// /// 1 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's request to stay this case while the 2 parties participate in mediation (part of Doc. #45) is denied. This case was filed February 3 23, 2004. This Court takes its duty and the parties' duty to reach a "speedy" resolution of 4 this case, under Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, seriously and this case 5 will not be stayed or continued any further. As a result, the parties must comply with all 6 deadlines set in the January 20, 2009 scheduling order (Doc. #42) while they participate 7 in mediation. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED this 8th day of April, 2009. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?