Radillo v. Lunes, et al
Filing
85
ORDER Denying 76 Motion to Compel Production of Documents signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 09/29/2009. (Flores, E)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6i0kij Plaintiff has filed a motion to compel the production of documents. Discovery in this matter closed on January 5, 2007. In his opposition, Defendant correctly notes that Plaintiff has offers no explanation for his delay, asserting only that the requested documents may lead him to admissible evidence. The Court finds that Plaintiff has not made a showing of good cause pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to compel the production of documents is denied. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. vs. JUAN RADILLO, Plaintiff, 1: 04 CV 05353 YNP GSA (PC) ORDER RE MOTION (DOC 76) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 29, 2009
/s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
