Martin v. Winett, et al

Filing 148

ORDER Requiring Defendants to File an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal 147 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/19/12. 10-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ERIC MARTIN, 10 11 12 CASE NO. 1:04-cv–05358-LJO-BAM PC Plaintiff, v. ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE AN OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL DAVID WINETT, et al., (ECF No. 147) 13 Defendants. / TEN DAY DEADLINE 14 15 Plaintiff Eric Martin (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 16 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Following the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth 17 Circuit order affirming the grant of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, but finding that 18 Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims against Defendant Winnett and Due Process claims against 19 Defendants Johnson, Stainer, and Winnett had been improperly dismissed at the screening stage, this 20 action is proceeding on the limited claims revived by the Ninth Circuit. On November 22, 2011, 21 Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. After being granted three extensions of time to 22 file an opposition, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal, requesting the action be dismissed 23 without prejudice. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within ten days from the date of service of 25 this order, Defendants shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s notice of 26 voluntary dismissal. 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 19, 2012 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe 1 1 cm411 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?