Buckley v. Scribner, et al

Filing 117

ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 116 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/4/2013. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ANTONIO CORTEZ BUCKLEY, Case No. 1:04-cv-05622-LJO-MJS (PC) 11 Plaintiff, VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION 12 v. (ECF No. 116) 13 A. K. SCRIBNER, et al., CLERK TO CLOSE CASE 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 Plaintiff Antonio Cortez Buckley, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis, filed this civil rights action on April 26, 2004 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The 19 parties filed a notice of settlement on July 30, 2013. (ECF No. 111.) The Court stayed the 20 second scheduling order, vacated the pretrial conference, ordered the parties file joint 21 documents disposing of this matter upon settlement by not later than November 11, 2013, 22 and left intact the December 10, 2013 trial date pending parties’ compliance with the 23 foregoing. (ECF Nos. 113, 115.) 24 On November 1, 2013, the parties filed a voluntary stipulation to dismissal with 25 prejudice of the entire action. (ECF No. 116.) Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A), a plaintiff 26 may dismiss an action without a court order by filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all 27 parties who have appeared. The parties’ voluntary stipulation is sufficient as a notice of 28 dismissal under Rule 41. 1 Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, this action is hereby DISMISSED WITH 1 2 PREJUDICE. 3 The December 10, 2013 trial date is VACATED. 4 The Clerk shall CLOSE this case. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 20 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill November 4, 2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 DEAC _Signature- END: b9ed48bb 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?