Buckley v. Scribner, et al

Filing 75

ORDER Requesting Confidential Statements re Case Selection for Prisoner Settlement Program, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/18/2012. 15-day deadline. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

ANTONIO CORTEZ BUCKLEY,

CASE NO.

1:04-CV-05622-LJO-MJS (PC)

9
Plaintiff,

10
11

ORDER REQUESTING CONFIDENTIAL
STATEMENTS RE: CASE SELECTION FOR
PRISONER SETTLEMENT PROGRAM

vs.
FIFTEEN (15) DAY DEADLINE

12
A.K. SCRIBNER, et al.,
13
14

Defendants.
_____________________________/

15
16

Plaintiff is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in

17

a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against

18

Defendants M. Dotson, R. Jarralimillio, R. Lerman, M. Ocegura, E. Parangan and R.

19

Peck. Discovery in this action has closed. The time to file dispositive motions has not

20

run. No trial date has been set.

21
22
23

Plaintiff has filed with the Court a Request for Settlement Conference. (Request,
ECF No. 74.)
The parties to this action shall each, no later than fifteen (15) days from the date

24

of service of this order, submit confidential statements as described below. The

25

confidential statements shall not be served on the opposing party or filed with the Court,

1

but instead, delivered by mail, fax, email or personal delivery to the Court’s Alternative

2

Dispute Resolution (ADR) Division, marked “Confidential”, at the following address:

3
ADR Division, Attention: Sujean Park
US District Court
501 I Street, Suite 4-200
Sacramento, CA 95814
Fax: [phone]
email: [e-mail]

4
5
6
7
8

Such statements shall be limited to five (5) pages and shall include the following:

9

1.

The party’s assessment of whether the instant action is of the type that
would benefit from a settlement proceeding,

10
2.

11

The party’s assessment of what factors, if any, will prevent settlement of
this matter prior to trial, and

12
3.

13

Any additional information the Court may find useful in determining
whether to set this matter for a settlement conference.

14

Should the Court determine this action to be appropriate for referral to the

15
16

Prisoner Settlement Program, the Court will set this matter for settlement conference

17

before a magistrate judge or district judge.

18
IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Dated:
12eob4

May 18, 2012

Michael J. Seng

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE