Hoffman v. Tonnemaker, et al
Filing
368
JUDGMENT dated *5/9/2011* in favor of Defendant Memorial Medical Center against Plaintiff Donna Hoffman signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/6/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DONNA HOFFMAN,
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CIV-F-04-5714 AWI DLB
JUDGMENT
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
This action came on regularly for trial on April 19, 2011in the above-entitled court. A jury of
eight persons was impaneled and sworn. Witnesses were sworn and testified. After hearing the
evidence and arguments of counsel, the jury was duly instructed by the court, and the cause was
submitted to the jury with directions to return verdicts on special questions. The jury deliberated,
and thereafter returned to court with its verdict consisting of the special issues submitted to the jury
and the answers given thereto by the jury, which said verdicts were in words as follows, to wit:
28
Case No. CIV-F-04-5714
1
JUDGMENT
1
2
We the jury in the above entitled action, find as follows:
Question No. 1:
3
4
Did Donna Hoffman receive a medical screening examination that
complied with EMTALA?
Answer:
Yes:
X
No: _________
5
6
Signed: ___/S/ Robert Korsinen
Presiding Juror
7
Dated: April 29, 2011
8
9
10
11
Thereafter, in open court, the jury was polled and each juror confirmed this was his or her
verdict.
The verdict being unanimous as to the claim brought, and based upon the special verdict of
12
the jury, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED, ORDERED AND DECREED that plaintiff Donna Hoffman,
13
shall take nothing and JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of defendant Memorial
14
Medical Center.
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
Dated:
0m8i78
May 6, 2011
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. CIV-F-04-5714
2
JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?