Jones v. Dept of Corrections
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Issued for Failing to File a Joint Pretrial Statement; Joint Pre-Trial Statement shall be submitted by MONDAY, DECEMBER 6, 20120 AT 10:00 A.M., signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/02/2010. Show Cause Response due by 12/6/2010. (Martin, S)
(PC) Jones v. Dept of Corrections
1 2 3 4 5 CHARLES JONES, 6 Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 R.J. GONZALES, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 This action is scheduled for a telephonic trial confirmation hearing on December 7, 2010 at 12 9:00 a.m. On September 13, 2010, the Court issued an order scheduling the telephonic trial 13 confirmation hearing and ordering the parties to submit a joint pretrial statement no later than 14 November 30, 2010. (Doc. #123.) The parties have failed to submit a join pretrial statement. 15 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 16 1. 17 2010 at 10:00 a.m.; and 18 2. 19 a.m. why sanctions should not issue for the failure to obey the September 13, 2010 20 court order. 21 Plaintiff's counsel should understand that an available sanction is dismissal. Defense counsel 22 should understand that an available sanction is a serious monetary assessment. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. 1:04-cv-05742-LJO-SKO PC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE ISSUED FOR FAILING TO FILE A JOINT PRETRIAL STATEMENT RESPONSE DUE BY DECEMBER 6, 2010 AT 10:00 a.m. /
The parties shall submit their joint pre-trial statement by Monday, December 6,
The parties are ordered to SHOW CAUSE by Monday, December 6, 2010 at 10:00
December 2, 2010
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?