James v. Scribner

Filing 273

ORDER ADOPTING 267 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS; Plaintiff's 257 motion for a court order, filed September 16, 2008, is denied signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 02/04/2009. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 U . S . D i s t r ic t C o u r t E. D . C a lifo r n ia UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) A.K. SCRIBNER, et. al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) JOHN E. JAMES III, CASE 1:04-cv-5878 LJO DLB PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 267) Plaintiff John James III, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. On December 23, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fifteen days. The parties have not filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. 2. The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 23, 2008, is adopted in full; and Plaintiff's motion for a court order, filed September 16, 2008, is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: b9ed48 February 4, 2009 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?