James v. Scribner

Filing 301

ORDER Adopting 296 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, and DENYING 295 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunctive Relief signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/19/2009. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 / 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Dated: b9ed48 August 19, 2009 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff John E. James III, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. On July 1, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. On July 29, 2009, plaintiff filed an Objection. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. 2. The Findings and Recommendations, filed July 1, 2009, is adopted in full; and Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunctive relief, filed June 25, 2009, is denied.IT IS SO ORDERED. v. A.K. SCRIBNER, et al., Defendants. JOHN E. JAMES, III, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:04-cv-05878-LJO DLB PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND/OR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (Doc. 296)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?