McKinney v. Dept of Corrections

Filing 98

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 97 Motion for a Finding by the Court on Motion for Reconsideration as Moot signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 11/2/2009. (Bradley, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. T. CASEY, et. al. Defendants. GREGORY MCKINNEY, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:04!CV!06030!SMM ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for a Finding by the Court on Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 97). Plaintiff's case is currently on appeal at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Doc. 93). On October 1, 2009, the Ninth Circuit issued an Order informing Plaintiff that his appeal had been filed during the pendency of a timely-filed Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4) motion. As a result, his Notice of Appeal was ineffective until entry of the district court order disposing of this motion, and the proceedings would be held in abeyance pending the resolution of Plaintiff's August 20, 2009 Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff now asks the Court to rule on his pending Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 91). This Court denied Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration on October 19, 2009 (Doc. 95). Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for a Finding will be denied as moot. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for a Finding by the Court on Motion for Reconsideration as moot (Doc. 97). DATED this 2nd day of November, 2009. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?