Contreraz v. Adams, et al

Filing 61

ORDER VACATING 44 Motion to Dismiss from Court's Calendar signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/28/2011. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
(PC) Contreraz v. Adams, et al Doc. 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants. ______________________________/ Plaintiff Quetzal Contreraz ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 17, 2010, Defendant Adams filed a motion to dismiss this action. (Doc. 44.) On November 2, 2010, Defendant Hetebrink joinded the motion to dismiss. (Doc. 54.) On February 25, 2011, following Plaintiff's motion, the Court granted Plaintiff an extension of time in which to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss. (Doc. 60.) In light of 28 U.S.C. § 476(a)(1), the Civil Justice Reform Act, Defendants' motion to dismiss is HEREBY DEEMED VACATED from the Court's calendar until such time as Plaintiff files his opposition and either Defendant files a reply or the motion is submitted pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: b9ed48 February 28, 2011 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE vs. (Doc. 44.) D. ADAMS, et al., QUETZAL CONTRERAZ, Plaintiff, 1:04-cv-06039-LJO-GSA-PC ORDER VACATING MOTION TO DISMISS FROM COURT'S CALENDAR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?