Holt v. Stockman, et al

Filing 165

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 162 Motion for Additional Discovery to Oppose Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 164 Motion for Extension of Time, until May 13, 2011 to File their Reply Brief signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 5/10/2011. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

Virgil E. Holt,
Plaintiff,

10
11

vs.

12
D. G. Stockman, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV 1-04-6073
ORDER

15
16
On April 5, 2011, the Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to File
17
Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and granted Plaintiff until April
18
22, 2011, to file his brief. On April 27, 2011, after the deadline for filing the opposition had
19
passed, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Additional Discovery to Oppose Defendants’ Motion for
20
Partial Summary Judgment. Plaintiff having failed to comply with the Court’s deadline for
21
filing his opposition brief and having failed to show good cause for this failure,
22
IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Additional Discovery to Oppose
23
Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (Doc. 162)
24
Having considered Defendants’ Request (Motion) for Extension of Time to File and Serve
25
Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and good cause appearing,
26
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Defendants’ motion. (Doc. 164)
27
28

1
2
3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Defendants’ request for a nine-day extension of
time, or until May 13, 2011, to file their reply brief.
DATED this 10th day of May, 2011.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-