Embry v. Guirbino

Filing 44

ORDER DENYING 38 Motion for Reconsideration, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/17/2017. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 RAYVAUGHN ROYCE EMBREY, 6 7 8 CASE NO. 1:04-CV-6101 AWI JMD Petitioner, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION v. G.J. GUIRBINO, (Doc. No. 38) 9 Respondent. 10 11 12 On September 15, 2017, the Court denied Petitioner’s Rule 60(b)(6) motion. See Doc. No. 13 37. As part of that order, the Court stated that no motions for reconsideration would be 14 considered. See id. 15 On October 2, 2017, Petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration. See Doc. No. 38. 16 The motion for reconsideration will be denied for two reasons. First, it is unauthorized and 17 violates the terms of the Court’s September 15, 2017 order. See Doc. No. 37. Second, Petitioner 18 has not shown that reconsideration is warranted. See Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos 19 Pharma GmbH & Co., 571 F.3d 873, 880 (9th Cir. 2009). Rather, the motion expresses 20 disagreements with the Court’s conclusions. Clark v. County of Tulare, 755 F.Supp.2d 1075, 21 1099-1100 (E.D. Cal. 2010). 22 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 38) is DENIED. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 17, 2017 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?