The Committee, et al v. City of Modesto, et al

Filing 554

ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/31/2011. (Leon-Guerrero, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

THE COMMITTEE CONCERNING
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT, et al.,

12

Case No. 1:04-cv-06121 LJO DLB
ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE

13

Plaintiffs,
vs.

14
CITY OF MODESTO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
________________________________/
17
On May 31, 2011, counsel for the parties reported to the Court that they had reached a
18
settlement, pending approval by the individual plaintiffs and the entity defendants. Counsel
19
reported that they and the staffs of the entities agreed to recommend approval of the settlement
20
agreement to the respective boards. Therefore:
21
1.

As soon as possible, Defendants SHALL notify Plaintiffs’ counsel of the dates

22
that the entities will consider approval of the settlement agreement;
23
2.

Plaintiffs’ counsel SHALL make best efforts to obtain the approval of the

24
settlement agreement by the individual plaintiffs by June 10, 2011. Once
25
approval is obtained, Plaintiffs’ counsel SHALL notify defense counsel
26
immediately;
27
3.
28

If the settlement agreement is approved by the entities, no later than June 30,

1

2011, the parties SHALL file a notice of settlement. The notice of settlement

2

SHALL set forth the proposed dates by which the acts required to terminate this

3

litigation, including any acts of the entities or their subordinate agencies and the

4

filing of the stipulated dismissal, will occur. Once filed, the notice of settlement

5

SHALL be filed and e-mailed to [e-mail];

6

4.

Discovery is STAYED until June 30, 2011.

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9

Dated: May 31, 2011
9j7khi

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE