Bowles, et al v. Wyeth Inc, et al

Filing 68

ORDER Relating To The Parties' Joint Proposed Trial and Pretrial Schedule, signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 09/20/2012. (Disclosure of Defendants Expert Reports 3/11/2013; Defendants Expert Discovery Deadline 4/12/2013; Dispositive/Daube rt Motions 4/26/2013; Hearing Dispositive/Daubert Motions TBD by Court; All Other Motions, including Motions in limine 5/13/2013; Hearing on MILs TBD by Court; Settlement Conference Cut-Off 5/1/2013; Joint Pre-Trial Order Due 5/17/2013; Joint Propose d Jury Questionnaire Due and Affirmative Prior Testimony Designations to be Exchanged 5/22/2013; Trial Briefs, Proposed Voir Dire and Jury Instructions Due, and Counter-Designations and Objections to Prior Testimony 6/3/2013; Final Pre-Trial Conference and Hearing on Remaining Objections to Exhibits and Designated Prior Testimony TBD by Court; Jury Trial (10th case to proceed) TBD by Court.)(Gaumnitz, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Philip C. Bourdette SBN 47492 Miriam Bourdette SBN 151980 BOURDETTE & PARTNERS 2924 West Main Street Visalia, CA 93291 (559) 625-8425 Fax (559) 625-8491 pcbb@bourdettelaw.com mrbb@bourdettelaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Simona A. Farrise SBN 171708 Leigh Kirmsse SBN 160967 Farrise Firm PC 225 South Olive St., Ste 102 Los Angeles, CA 90012 310-424-3355 FAX 510-588-4536 sfarrise@farriselaw.com LKirmsse@farriselaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sharon J.Arkin SBN #154858 The Arkin Law Firm 333 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 (541) 469-2892 FAX: 866) 571-5676 sarkin@arkinlawfirm.com Attorney for Plaintiffs Pamela Yates SBN 137740 Wendy S. Dowse SBN 261224 Julie A. Belezzuoli SBN 267302 KAYE SCHOLER LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1600 Los Angeles, CA 90067 (310) 788-1000 FAX (310) 788-1200 pyates@kayescholer.com wdowse@kayescholer.com julie.belezzuoli@kayscholer.com Attorneys for Defendants 26 27 28 ORDER RELATING TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT PROPOSED TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION 1 2 3 4 NANCY WADDELL, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 5 6 7 8 9 Plaintiff, vs. WYETH LLC, et al. Defendants. Case No.: 1:04-cv-06343-JRG-DLB ORDER RELATING TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT PROPOSED TRIAL AND PRETRIAL SCHEDULE 10 11 ) ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-02404-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) KAY UHALT and STEPHEN UHALT, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiffs, vs. WYETH LLC, et al. 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 DOROTHY SETSER and HOWARD SETSER, ) ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-02405-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 20 21 22 23 Plaintiffs, vs. WYETH LLC, et al. Defendants 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER RELATING TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT PROPOSED TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE 1 2 3 4 ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-02394-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CAROL HILL and LEONARD HILL Plaintiffs, vs. WYETH LLC. et al Defendants. 5 6 7 8 ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-02395-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MARIANNE PHILLIPS and WILLIAM PHILLIPS, 9 Plaintiffs, 10 11 12 vs. WYETH LLC, et al. 13 14 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, vs. WYETH LLC, et al. 19 Defendants. 20 21 BETTY CRAVEN and GEORGE CRAVEN, 22 Plaintiffs, 23 24 25 26 vs. WYETH LLC, et al. Defendants. Case No.: 1:10-cv-02384-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) GLORIETTE MCPHERSON, Case No.: 1:10-cv-02382-JRG-DLB 27 28 3 ORDER RELATING TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT PROPOSED TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE 1 SHIRLEY BOWLES and GERALD BOWLES, ) ) Case No.: 1:04-cv-06346-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-02392-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2 Plaintiffs, 3 4 5 vs. WYETH LLC, et al. 6 Defendants. 7 8 DONNA HAMES and MICHAEL HAMES 9 10 11 Plaintiffs, vs. WYETH LLC, et al. 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 16 17 18 ) ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-02397-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VICTORIA POOLE and DELBERT POOLE Plaintiffs, vs. WYETH LLC, et al. 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 LOIS ZANYK 23 24 25 ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-00287-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. PFIZER INC., et al. 26 27 28 Defendants. 4 ORDER RELATING TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT PROPOSED TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE 1 ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-00289-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CARLEEN WEST 2 Plaintiff, 3 4 5 vs. PFIZER INC., et al. 6 Defendants. 7 8 ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-00288-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PAMELA TURNER 9 Plaintiff, 10 11 12 vs. PFIZER INC., et al. 13 Defendants. 14 15 ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-00282-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) LUCILLE MACIAS 16 Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 vs. PFIZER INC., et al. Defendants. 21 22 23 24 The Court having considered the Joint Proposed Trial and Pre-Trial Schedule filed by the Parties in these actions, and finding good cause therefore; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 25 26 27 28 5 ORDER RELATING TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT PROPOSED TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE 1) 1 2 3 The following trial and pre-trial schedule is set in the matter of Waddell v. Wyeth LLC, et al. Per the Court’s order on September 4, 2012, the matter of Waddell v. Wyeth LLC, et al will be the first set trial scheduled to begin on February 5, 2013. 4 EVENT 5 Disclosure of Defendants’ Expert Reports November 16, 2012 Defendants’ Expert Discovery Deadline November 30, 2012 Dispositive/Daubert Motions December 10, 2012 6 PROPOSED DEADLINE 7 8 Hearing Dispositive/Daubert Motions TBD by Court 10 All Other Motions, including Motions in limine January 4, 2013 11 Hearing on MILs TBD by Court 12 Settlement Conference Cut-Off January 2, 2013 13 Joint Pre-Trial Order Due January 8, 2013 14 Joint Proposed Jury Questionnaire Due and Affirmative Prior Testimony Designations to be Exchanged; January 11, 2013 Trial Briefs, Proposed Voir Dire and Jury Instructions Due, and Counter-Designations and Objections to Prior Testimony January 23, 2013 9 15 16 17 18 Final Pre-Trial Conference and Hearing on Remaining Objections to Exhibits and Designated Prior Testimony 19 Trial 20 TBD by Court Jury/Non-Jury February 5, 2013 Jury 21 22 2) The following trial and pre-trial schedule is set in the matters of Zanyk v. Wyeth 23 Inc., et al, West v. Pfizer Inc., et al, Turner v. Pfizer Inc., et al, and Macias v. Pfizer Inc., et al. 24 These cases will be the next set to proceed to trial following Waddell v. Wyeth LLC, et al. As 25 indicated in the Court’s prior ruling, these cases will not be consolidated for trial. 26 27 28 6 ORDER RELATING TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT PROPOSED TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE 1 EVENT 2 Hearing Dispositive/Daubert Motions TBD by Court 3 All Other Motions, including Motions in limine January 4, 2013 4 Hearing on MILs TBD by Court 5 Settlement Conference Cut-Off January 2, 2013 6 Joint Pre-Trial Order Due January 8, 2013 Joint Proposed Jury Questionnaire Due and Affirmative Prior Testimony Designations to be Exchanged; January 11, 2013 Trial Briefs, Proposed Voir Dire and Jury Instructions Due, and Counter-Designations and Objections to Prior Testimony January 23, 2013 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 PROPOSED DEADLINE Final Pre-Trial Conference and Hearing on Remaining Objections to Exhibits and Designated Prior Testimony TBD by Court Trial TBD by Court Jury/Non-Jury Jury 14 15 16 17 18 3) The following trial and pre-trial schedule is set in the matters of Uhalt v. Wyeth LLC, et al, Setser v. Wyeth LLC, et al, Phillips v. Wyeth LLC, et al, & Hill v. Wyeth LLC, et al. These cases will the next set to proceed to trial following Zanyk v. Wyeth Inc., et al, West v. Pfizer Inc., et al, Turner v. Pfizer Inc., et al, and Macias v. Pfizer Inc., et al. As indicated in the Court’s prior ruling, these cases will not be consolidated for trial. 19 20 EVENT PROPOSED DEADLINE 21 Disclosure of Defendants’ Expert Reports January 28, 2013 22 Defendants’ Expert Discovery Deadline February 18, 2013 23 Dispositive/Daubert Motions March 4, 2013 24 Hearing Dispositive/Daubert Motions TBD by Court 25 All Other Motions, including Motions in limine March 18, 2013 26 Hearing on MILs TBD by Court 27 28 7 ORDER RELATING TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT PROPOSED TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE 1 Settlement Conference Cut-Off March 1, 2013 2 Joint Pre-Trial Order Due March 22, 2013 3 Joint Proposed Jury Questionnaire Due and Affirmative Prior Testimony Designations to be Exchanged; March 29, 2013 Trial Briefs, Proposed Voir Dire and Jury Instructions Due, and Counter-Designations and Objections to Prior Testimony April 8, 2013 TBD by Court 7 Final Pre-Trial Conference and Hearing on Remaining Objections to Exhibits and Designated Prior Testimony 8 Trial TBD by Court 9 Jury/Non-Jury 4 5 6 Jury 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 4) The following trial and pre-trial schedule is set in the matters of Bowles v. Wyeth LLC, et al, Poole v. Wyeth LLC, et al, McPherson v. Wyeth LLC, et al, Hames v. Wyeth LLC, et al & Craven v. Wyeth LLC, et al. These cases will be the next set to proceed to trial following Uhalt v. Wyeth LLC, et al, Setser v. Wyeth LLC, et al, Phillips v. Wyeth LLC, et al, & Hill v. Wyeth LLC, et al. As indicated in the Court’s prior ruling, these cases will not be consolidated for trial. EVENT PROPOSED DEADLINE Disclosure of Defendants’ Expert Reports March 11, 2013 17 Defendants’ Expert Discovery Deadline April 12, 2013 Dispositive/Daubert Motions April 26, 2013 20 Hearing Dispositive/Daubert Motions TBD by Court 21 All Other Motions, including Motions in limine May 13, 2013 22 Hearing on MILs TBD by Court 23 Settlement Conference Cut-Off May 1, 2013 24 Joint Pre-Trial Order Due May 17, 2013 25 Joint Proposed Jury Questionnaire Due and Affirmative Prior Testimony Designations to be Exchanged; May 22, 2013 18 19 26 27 28 8 ORDER RELATING TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT PROPOSED TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE 1 2 Trial Briefs, Proposed Voir Dire and Jury Instructions Due, and Counter-Designations and Objections to Prior Testimony June 3, 2013 TBD by Court 3 Final Pre-Trial Conference and Hearing on Remaining Objections to Exhibits and Designated Prior Testimony 4 Trial TBD by Court 5 Jury/Non-Jury Jury 6 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED 11 12 13 Dated: September 20, 2012 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 9 ORDER RELATING TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT PROPOSED TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?