Bowles, et al v. Wyeth Inc, et al
Filing
68
ORDER Relating To The Parties' Joint Proposed Trial and Pretrial Schedule, signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 09/20/2012. (Disclosure of Defendants Expert Reports 3/11/2013; Defendants Expert Discovery Deadline 4/12/2013; Dispositive/Daube rt Motions 4/26/2013; Hearing Dispositive/Daubert Motions TBD by Court; All Other Motions, including Motions in limine 5/13/2013; Hearing on MILs TBD by Court; Settlement Conference Cut-Off 5/1/2013; Joint Pre-Trial Order Due 5/17/2013; Joint Propose d Jury Questionnaire Due and Affirmative Prior Testimony Designations to be Exchanged 5/22/2013; Trial Briefs, Proposed Voir Dire and Jury Instructions Due, and Counter-Designations and Objections to Prior Testimony 6/3/2013; Final Pre-Trial Conference and Hearing on Remaining Objections to Exhibits and Designated Prior Testimony TBD by Court; Jury Trial (10th case to proceed) TBD by Court.)(Gaumnitz, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Philip C. Bourdette SBN 47492
Miriam Bourdette SBN 151980
BOURDETTE & PARTNERS
2924 West Main Street
Visalia, CA 93291
(559) 625-8425
Fax (559) 625-8491
pcbb@bourdettelaw.com
mrbb@bourdettelaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Simona A. Farrise SBN 171708
Leigh Kirmsse SBN 160967
Farrise Firm PC
225 South Olive St., Ste 102
Los Angeles, CA 90012
310-424-3355
FAX 510-588-4536
sfarrise@farriselaw.com
LKirmsse@farriselaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Sharon J.Arkin SBN #154858
The Arkin Law Firm
333 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
(541) 469-2892
FAX: 866) 571-5676
sarkin@arkinlawfirm.com
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Pamela Yates SBN 137740
Wendy S. Dowse SBN 261224
Julie A. Belezzuoli SBN 267302
KAYE SCHOLER LLP
1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1600
Los Angeles, CA 90067
(310) 788-1000
FAX (310) 788-1200
pyates@kayescholer.com
wdowse@kayescholer.com
julie.belezzuoli@kayscholer.com
Attorneys for Defendants
26
27
28
ORDER RELATING TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT PROPOSED TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRESNO DIVISION
1
2
3
4
NANCY WADDELL,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
5
6
7
8
9
Plaintiff,
vs.
WYETH LLC, et al.
Defendants.
Case No.: 1:04-cv-06343-JRG-DLB
ORDER RELATING
TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT
PROPOSED TRIAL AND PRETRIAL SCHEDULE
10
11
)
) Case No.: 1:10-cv-02404-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
KAY UHALT and STEPHEN UHALT,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiffs,
vs.
WYETH LLC, et al.
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
DOROTHY SETSER and HOWARD SETSER,
)
) Case No.: 1:10-cv-02405-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
20
21
22
23
Plaintiffs,
vs.
WYETH LLC, et al.
Defendants
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER RELATING TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT PROPOSED TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE
1
2
3
4
)
Case No.: 1:10-cv-02394-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CAROL HILL and LEONARD HILL
Plaintiffs,
vs.
WYETH LLC. et al
Defendants.
5
6
7
8
)
Case No.: 1:10-cv-02395-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
MARIANNE PHILLIPS and WILLIAM
PHILLIPS,
9
Plaintiffs,
10
11
12
vs.
WYETH LLC, et al.
13
14
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff,
vs.
WYETH LLC, et al.
19
Defendants.
20
21
BETTY CRAVEN and GEORGE CRAVEN,
22
Plaintiffs,
23
24
25
26
vs.
WYETH LLC, et al.
Defendants.
Case No.: 1:10-cv-02384-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
GLORIETTE MCPHERSON,
Case No.: 1:10-cv-02382-JRG-DLB
27
28
3
ORDER RELATING TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT PROPOSED TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE
1
SHIRLEY BOWLES and GERALD BOWLES,
)
) Case No.: 1:04-cv-06346-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:10-cv-02392-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2
Plaintiffs,
3
4
5
vs.
WYETH LLC, et al.
6
Defendants.
7
8
DONNA HAMES and MICHAEL HAMES
9
10
11
Plaintiffs,
vs.
WYETH LLC, et al.
12
Defendants.
13
14
15
16
17
18
)
) Case No.: 1:10-cv-02397-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
VICTORIA POOLE and DELBERT POOLE
Plaintiffs,
vs.
WYETH LLC, et al.
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
LOIS ZANYK
23
24
25
)
Case No.: 1:10-cv-00287-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
vs.
PFIZER INC., et al.
26
27
28
Defendants.
4
ORDER RELATING TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT PROPOSED TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE
1
)
Case No.: 1:10-cv-00289-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CARLEEN WEST
2
Plaintiff,
3
4
5
vs.
PFIZER INC., et al.
6
Defendants.
7
8
)
Case No.: 1:10-cv-00288-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
PAMELA TURNER
9
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
vs.
PFIZER INC., et al.
13
Defendants.
14
15
)
Case No.: 1:10-cv-00282-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
LUCILLE MACIAS
16
Plaintiff,
17
18
19
20
vs.
PFIZER INC., et al.
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
The Court having considered the Joint Proposed Trial and Pre-Trial Schedule filed by the
Parties in these actions, and finding good cause therefore;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
25
26
27
28
5
ORDER RELATING TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT PROPOSED TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE
1)
1
2
3
The following trial and pre-trial schedule is set in the matter of Waddell v. Wyeth
LLC, et al. Per the Court’s order on September 4, 2012, the matter of Waddell v. Wyeth LLC, et
al will be the first set trial scheduled to begin on February 5, 2013.
4
EVENT
5
Disclosure of Defendants’ Expert Reports
November 16, 2012
Defendants’ Expert Discovery Deadline
November 30, 2012
Dispositive/Daubert Motions
December 10, 2012
6
PROPOSED DEADLINE
7
8
Hearing Dispositive/Daubert Motions
TBD by Court
10
All Other Motions, including Motions in limine
January 4, 2013
11
Hearing on MILs
TBD by Court
12
Settlement Conference Cut-Off
January 2, 2013
13
Joint Pre-Trial Order Due
January 8, 2013
14
Joint Proposed Jury Questionnaire Due and Affirmative Prior
Testimony Designations to be Exchanged;
January 11, 2013
Trial Briefs, Proposed Voir Dire and Jury Instructions Due,
and Counter-Designations and Objections to Prior Testimony
January 23, 2013
9
15
16
17
18
Final Pre-Trial Conference and Hearing on Remaining
Objections to Exhibits and Designated Prior Testimony
19
Trial
20
TBD by Court
Jury/Non-Jury
February 5, 2013
Jury
21
22
2)
The following trial and pre-trial schedule is set in the matters of Zanyk v. Wyeth
23
Inc., et al, West v. Pfizer Inc., et al, Turner v. Pfizer Inc., et al, and Macias v. Pfizer Inc., et al.
24
These cases will be the next set to proceed to trial following Waddell v. Wyeth LLC, et al. As
25
indicated in the Court’s prior ruling, these cases will not be consolidated for trial.
26
27
28
6
ORDER RELATING TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT PROPOSED TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE
1
EVENT
2
Hearing Dispositive/Daubert Motions
TBD by Court
3
All Other Motions, including Motions in limine
January 4, 2013
4
Hearing on MILs
TBD by Court
5
Settlement Conference Cut-Off
January 2, 2013
6
Joint Pre-Trial Order Due
January 8, 2013
Joint Proposed Jury Questionnaire Due and Affirmative Prior
Testimony Designations to be Exchanged;
January 11, 2013
Trial Briefs, Proposed Voir Dire and Jury Instructions Due,
and Counter-Designations and Objections to Prior Testimony
January 23, 2013
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
PROPOSED DEADLINE
Final Pre-Trial Conference and Hearing on Remaining
Objections to Exhibits and Designated Prior Testimony
TBD by Court
Trial
TBD by Court
Jury/Non-Jury
Jury
14
15
16
17
18
3)
The following trial and pre-trial schedule is set in the matters of Uhalt v. Wyeth
LLC, et al, Setser v. Wyeth LLC, et al, Phillips v. Wyeth LLC, et al, & Hill v. Wyeth LLC, et al.
These cases will the next set to proceed to trial following Zanyk v. Wyeth Inc., et al, West v. Pfizer
Inc., et al, Turner v. Pfizer Inc., et al, and Macias v. Pfizer Inc., et al. As indicated in the Court’s
prior ruling, these cases will not be consolidated for trial.
19
20
EVENT
PROPOSED DEADLINE
21
Disclosure of Defendants’ Expert Reports
January 28, 2013
22
Defendants’ Expert Discovery Deadline
February 18, 2013
23
Dispositive/Daubert Motions
March 4, 2013
24
Hearing Dispositive/Daubert Motions
TBD by Court
25
All Other Motions, including Motions in limine
March 18, 2013
26
Hearing on MILs
TBD by Court
27
28
7
ORDER RELATING TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT PROPOSED TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE
1
Settlement Conference Cut-Off
March 1, 2013
2
Joint Pre-Trial Order Due
March 22, 2013
3
Joint Proposed Jury Questionnaire Due and Affirmative Prior
Testimony Designations to be Exchanged;
March 29, 2013
Trial Briefs, Proposed Voir Dire and Jury Instructions Due,
and Counter-Designations and Objections to Prior Testimony
April 8, 2013
TBD by Court
7
Final Pre-Trial Conference and Hearing on Remaining
Objections to Exhibits and Designated Prior Testimony
8
Trial
TBD by Court
9
Jury/Non-Jury
4
5
6
Jury
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
4)
The following trial and pre-trial schedule is set in the matters of Bowles v. Wyeth
LLC, et al, Poole v. Wyeth LLC, et al, McPherson v. Wyeth LLC, et al, Hames v. Wyeth LLC, et al
& Craven v. Wyeth LLC, et al. These cases will be the next set to proceed to trial following Uhalt
v. Wyeth LLC, et al, Setser v. Wyeth LLC, et al, Phillips v. Wyeth LLC, et al, & Hill v. Wyeth LLC,
et al. As indicated in the Court’s prior ruling, these cases will not be consolidated for trial.
EVENT
PROPOSED DEADLINE
Disclosure of Defendants’ Expert Reports
March 11, 2013
17
Defendants’ Expert Discovery Deadline
April 12, 2013
Dispositive/Daubert Motions
April 26, 2013
20
Hearing Dispositive/Daubert Motions
TBD by Court
21
All Other Motions, including Motions in limine
May 13, 2013
22
Hearing on MILs
TBD by Court
23
Settlement Conference Cut-Off
May 1, 2013
24
Joint Pre-Trial Order Due
May 17, 2013
25
Joint Proposed Jury Questionnaire Due and Affirmative Prior
Testimony Designations to be Exchanged;
May 22, 2013
18
19
26
27
28
8
ORDER RELATING TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT PROPOSED TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE
1
2
Trial Briefs, Proposed Voir Dire and Jury Instructions Due,
and Counter-Designations and Objections to Prior Testimony
June 3, 2013
TBD by Court
3
Final Pre-Trial Conference and Hearing on Remaining
Objections to Exhibits and Designated Prior Testimony
4
Trial
TBD by Court
5
Jury/Non-Jury
Jury
6
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED
11
12
13
Dated: September 20, 2012
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9
ORDER RELATING TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT PROPOSED TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?