Bowles, et al v. Wyeth Inc, et al

Filing 71

ORDER Granting Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice Pursuant to Rule 41, signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 11/13/12. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Philip C. Bourdette SBN 47492 Miriam Bourdette SBN 151980 BOURDETTE & PARTNERS 2924 West Main Street Visalia, CA 93291 (559) 625-8425 Fax (559) 625-8491 pcbb@bourdettelaw.com mrbb@bourdettelaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Simona A. Farrise SBN 171708 Leigh Kirmsse SBN 160967 Farrise Firm PC 225 South Olive St., Ste 102 Los Angeles, CA 90012 310-424-3355 FAX 510-588-4536 sfarrise@farriselaw.com LKirmsse@farriselaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sharon J. Arkin SBN #154858 The Arkin Law Firm 333 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 (541) 469-2892 FAX: 866) 571-5676 sarkin@arkinlawfirm.com Attorney for Plaintiffs Pamela Yates SBN 137740 Wendy S. Dowse SBN 261224 Julie A. Belezzuoli SBN 267302 KAYE SCHOLER LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1600 Los Angeles, CA 90067 (310) 788-1000 FAX (310) 788-1200 pyates@kayescholer.com wdowse@kayescholer.com julie.belezzuoli@kayscholer.com Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION 1 2 3 4 NANCY WADDELL, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 5 6 7 8 9 Plaintiff, vs. WYETH LLC, et al. Defendants. Case No.: 1:04-cv-06343-JRG-DLB ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO RULE 41 10 11 ) ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-02404-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) KAY UHALT and STEPHEN UHALT, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiffs, vs. WYETH LLC, et al. 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 DOROTHY SETSER and HOWARD SETSER, 20 21 22 23 ) ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-02405-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, vs. WYETH LLC, et al. Defendants 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 3 4 ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-02394-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CAROL HILL and LEONARD HILL Plaintiffs, vs. WYETH LLC. et al Defendants. 5 6 7 8 ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-02395-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MARIANNE PHILLIPS and WILLIAM PHILLIPS, 9 Plaintiffs, 10 11 12 vs. WYETH LLC, et al. 13 14 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, vs. WYETH LLC, et al. 19 Defendants. 20 21 BETTY CRAVEN and GEORGE CRAVEN, 22 Plaintiffs, 23 24 25 26 vs. WYETH LLC, et al. Defendants. 27 28 3 Case No.: 1:10-cv-02384-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) GLORIETTE MCPHERSON, Case No.: 1:10-cv-02382-JRG-DLB 1 SHIRLEY BOWLES and GERALD BOWLES, ) ) Case No.: 1:04-cv-06346-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-02392-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2 Plaintiffs, 3 4 5 vs. WYETH LLC, et al. 6 Defendants. 7 8 DONNA HAMES and MICHAEL HAMES 9 10 11 Plaintiffs, vs. WYETH LLC, et al. 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 VICTORIA POOLE and DELBERT POOLE 16 17 18 ) ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-02397-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, vs. WYETH LLC, et al. 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-00287-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) LOIS ZANYK Plaintiff, vs. PFIZER INC., et al. 26 27 28 Defendants. 4 1 ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-00289-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CARLEEN WEST 2 Plaintiff, 3 4 5 vs. PFIZER INC., et al. 6 Defendants. 7 8 ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-00288-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PAMELA TURNER 9 Plaintiff, 10 11 12 vs. PFIZER INC., et al. 13 Defendants. 14 15 ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-00282-JRG-DLB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) LUCILLE MACIAS 16 Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 vs. PFIZER INC., et al. Defendants. 21 22 23 24 The Court having considered the Parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice Pursuant to Rule 41 and the files and pleadings herein; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 25 26 27 28 5 1 1. The above-captioned actions are dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants, 2 with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. All other relief not expressly granted 3 herein is denied. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED 6 7 Dated: November 13, 2012 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?