McMaster v. Yates, et al
Filing
96
ORDER, signed by District Judge Frank R. Zapata on 5/26/2011. 85 Motion to Withdrawl Motion and 92 Motion for Pretrial Conference are DENIED; 95 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. (Responses due by 6/30/2011.) (Marrujo, C)
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
Dana McMaster,
6
7
Plaintiff,
vs.
8
Doctor Thomas, et al.,
9
Defendants.
10
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 1-04-6453-FRZ
ORDER
11
12
Pending before the Court are several documents filed by Plaintiff. In Doc. 85,
13
Plaintiff appears to explain that a previous document he filed was premature; based on the
14
record before the Court, Doc. 85 appears moot and is denied as moot. In Doc. 92, Plaintiff
15
appears to request a pretrial conference so the Court can explain to Plaintiff how to litigate
16
the case he has initiated. As discovery has closed, a dispositive motion is pending, Plaintiff
17
cites no specific facts or authority to support his position, and Plaintiff’s request of the Court
18
is improper, Doc. 92 is denied. Plaintiff’s request for additional time (Doc. 95) to respond
19
to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted; Plaintiff shall file his response to
20
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment by no later than 6/30/11. If Plaintiff fails to
21
respond by 6/30/11, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment may be granted without
22
further notice to Plaintiff. Accordingly, Doc. 85 and 92 are denied and Doc. 95 is granted.
23
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals requires the Court to provide pro se prisoners
24
with notice of the requirements of Summary Judgment under Rule 561 of the Federal Rules
25
of Civil Procedure. See Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998).
26
27
28
1
The Court notes that Plaintiff was already informed of his obligations to respond
to a summary judgment motion in the Scheduling Order issued by the Court in September
of 2010.
1
ACCORDINGLY, the Court NOTIFIES the Plaintiff as follows:
2
1.
The Defendants are seeking to have your case dismissed through a Motion for
3
Summary Judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Summary
4
Judgment means that instead of going to trial where you and Defendants can argue your
5
versions of the facts and present witnesses in support of your versions of the facts, the Court
6
decides the case after reading the Motion, your Response, and the Defendants’ Reply. IF
7
THE COURT GRANTS THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, YOUR
8
CASE WILL BE OVER AND THERE WILL BE NO TRIAL. Rule 56 tells you what
9
you must do in order to oppose the motion.
10
a) Generally, a Motion for Summary Judgment must be granted when the Court
11
finds that, through the Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendants have demonstrated there
12
is no real dispute about any fact that would affect the outcome of your case, and the Court
13
is able to decide that the Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
14
b) When Defendants support a Motion for Summary Judgment with proper
15
declarations (or other sworn testimony) or other evidence, you cannot merely rely on what
16
your Complaint says to defend your version of the issues and facts. Instead, you must show
17
that there is a genuine issue of material fact. In order to do this, you must also set out
18
specific facts in declarations, depositions, answers to interrogatories, or authenticated
19
documents, as provided in Rule 56, that contradict the facts shown in the Defendant’s
20
declarations and documents.
21
c) The declarations or other sworn testimony setting out your specific facts must
22
be made on personal knowledge, must set forth such facts as would be admissible as
23
evidence, and must affirmatively show that the affiant is competent to testify regarding the
24
matters in the declaration or other sworn testimony.
25
d) If the Court determines that any of the declarations or other sworn testimony
26
are made in bad faith, the Court may order the party employing the bad faith to pay the other
27
party for costs associated with controverting that testimony, including the other party’s
28
attorney’s fees.
-2-
1
2. If you do not submit your own evidence in opposition to the Motion, the moving
2
party’s evidence might be taken as truth and final Judgment might be entered against you
3
without a trial. IF THAT OCCURS, YOUR CASE WILL BE OVER AND THERE
4
WILL BE NO TRIAL.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
3. Local Rule 56-260 also requires, in part:
a) Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication. Each
motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication shall be accompanied by a
"Statement of Undisputed Facts" that shall enumerate discretely each of the specific
material facts relied upon in support of the motion and cite the particular portions of any
pleading, affidavit, deposition, interrogatory answer, admission, or other document
relied upon to establish that fact. The moving party shall be responsible for the filing of
all evidentiary documents cited in the moving papers. See L.R. 133(j).
(b) Opposition. Any party opposing a motion for summary judgment or
summary adjudication shall reproduce the itemized facts in the Statement of Undisputed
Facts and admit those facts that are undisputed and deny those that are disputed,
including with each denial a citation to the particular portions of any pleading, affidavit,
deposition, interrogatory answer, admission, or other document relied upon in support of
that denial. The opposing party may also file a concise "Statement of Disputed Facts,"
and the source thereof in the record, of all additional material facts as to which there is a
genuine issue precluding summary judgment or adjudication. The opposing party shall
be responsible for the filing of all evidentiary documents cited in the opposing papers.
See L.R. 133(j). If a need for discovery is asserted as a basis for denial of the motion,
the party opposing the motion shall provide a specification of the particular facts on
which discovery is to be had or the issues on which discovery is necessary.
(c) Stipulated Facts. All interested parties may jointly file a stipulation
16
4. If you do not respond to the Motion for Summary Judgment, your failure to
17
respond can be viewed as you agreeing to the Court granting the Motion and final Judgment
18
might be entered against you without a trial. IF THAT OCCURS, YOUR CASE WILL
19
BE OVER AND THERE WILL BE NO TRIAL.
20
DATED this 26th day of May, 2011.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?