Mauldin v. Nason, et al
Filing
35
ORDER ADOPTING 30 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 04/20/2010. Defendant Butts is Terminated from Action. (Flores, E)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 C. NASON, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter 16 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 17 Rule 72-302. 18 On March 15, 2010, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending 19 dismissal of Defendant Butts for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 20 Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed 21 objections to the findings and recommendations. 22 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 23 73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 24 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 25 proper analysis. 26 1 vs. ORDER RE: FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS (#30) CHARLES JAMES MAULDIN, Plaintiff, 1: 04 CV 06527 LJO MJS (PC) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: b9ed48
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on March 15, 2010, are adopted in full; and 2. Defendant Butts is dismissed based on Plaintiff's failure to state any claims against him.
April 20, 2010
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?