Willis v. Mullins, et al

Filing 214

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/31/2009. Pretrial Conference set for 12/16/2009 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii; Jury Trial set for 2/2/2010 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii. (Esteves, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 GARY WILLIS, 9 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 14 JOSEPH MULLINS et al., 15 16 Defendant. 17 ___________________________________ 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 On July 30, 2009, the Court conducted a telephonic scheduling conference to discuss the trial date in this case. Marion Yagman appeared on behalf of Plaintiff Gary Willis. Michael Lehman appeared on behalf of Defendants Gary Mullins and Silvius. Mark Nations appeared on behalf of Defendant Bill Hood. James Flynn and Mark Kubicek appeared on behalf of Defendant Diane Mora. The pretrial conference will be held on December 16, 2009, at 8:30 am in Courtroom 2 before the Honorable Chief Judge Anthony Ishii. The trial will begin on February 2, 2010, at ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:04-cv-6542 AWI GSA U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER New Pretrial Conf.: Date : Dec. 16, 2009 Time: 8:30 am Courtroom: (2) AWI Date : Feb. 2, 2010 Jury Trial Est. Time 5-6 days Time: 8:30 am Courtroom: (2) AWI New Trial : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8:30 am in Courtroom 2 before the Honorable Chief Judge Anthony Ishii and is estimated to last five to six days. I. Pretrial Conference Date Prior to the pretrial conference, the parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 16-281(a)(2). The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word Perfect X31 format, directly to Judge Ishii's chambers by emailing it to awiorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The parties' attention is directed to Rules 16-281 and 16-282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pretrial conference. The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. III. Trial Issues Plaintiff anticipates that the estimated time for trial is five to six days. Defendants are unable to provide an estimate of the number of days for trial because they are unable to uncertain what witnesses and evidence Plaintiff will produce, particularly because Plaintiff is a fugitive. Plaintiff will oppose any request for bifurcation by Defendants. The Parties' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California, Rule 16-285, for preparation of trial briefs. The Court will insist upon strict compliance with that rule. VI. Effect of this Order The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the Court and the parties as to the agenda most suitable to dispose of this case. If the parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered to notify the Court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by subsequent status conference. If WordPerfect X3 is not available to the parties then the latest version of WordPerfect or any other word processing program in general use for IBM compatible personal computers is acceptable. 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 cf0di0 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulations extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause for granting the relief requested. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 31, 2009 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?