Tyler v. Alameida, et al

Filing 137

ORDER Denying 126 Motion to Modify Scheduling Order, without Prejudice, as Moot, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 6/16/2010. (Verduzco, M)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: icido3 June 16, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This is a civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Plaintiff Elonza Jesse Tyler, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. On March 25, 2010, Defendants Erly and Smith filed a motion seeking to modify the schedule order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). In light of the Court's recommendation that Plaintiff's amended complaint be dismissed, with leave to amend, Defendants' motion to modify the scheduling order is moot. If the second amended complaint is found to state cognizable claims, Defendant Erly will be required to respond and the Court will issue an amended scheduling order at the appropriate juncture. Accordingly, Defendants' motion to modify the scheduling order is HEREBY DENIED as v. EDWARD ALAMEIDA, et al., Defendants. / ELONZA JESSE TYLER, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:04-cv-06638-LJO-SMS PC ORDER DENYING MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AS MOOT (Doc. 126)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT