Williams v. Adams et al
ORDER DENYING 121 Plaintiff's Motion for Status Conference and Directing Clerk's Office to Send Plaintiff a Copy of the Docket, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 11/2/2010. (Jessen, A)
(PC) Williams v. Adams et al
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MARCUS R. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. DERRAL G. ADAMS, et al.,
CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00124-AWI-SMS PC ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR STATUS CONFERENCE, AND DIRECTING CLERK'S OFFICE TO SEND PLAINTIFF A COPY OF THE DOCKET (Doc. 121)
Defendants. / On July 26, 2010, Plaintiff Marcus R. Williams, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action, filed a motion seeking a status conference to discuss the receipt of his opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment and whether there are any errors or discrepancies he needs to correct. Defendants' motion for summary judgment was deemed submitted following their reply to Plaintiff's opposition, and the motion is pending consideration. Local Rule 230(l). If the Court finds further briefing or a hearing necessary during the course of its consideration of Defendants' motion, it will issue an appropriate order at that time. The Court will provide Plaintiff with a copy of the docket for his review, but a status conference is unnecessary. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for a status conference is HEREBY DENIED, and the Clerk's Office is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a copy of the docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: i0d3h8 November 2, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?